2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Taint reachability over the CPG: the arbiter for the flow families (Req 6.1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The verdict is the static analogue of a reproduced crash. An unsanitized source→sink path is `ENTAILED` — the
|
|
|
|
|
graph establishes it and the LLM's claim is no longer load-bearing. A path a sanitizer may break is
|
|
|
|
|
`CORROBORATED`: the flow is real, but whether the sanitizer is *sufficient* is a semantic judgement the model
|
|
|
|
|
cannot make, and that residual is the LLM's — checked against this verdict rather than averaged over runs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No path at all yields `None`, not a negative verdict: the caller reports `suspicion`. And a query that failed
|
|
|
|
|
yields `None` too, because "the engine could not decide" is not "there is no flow" — conflating them is how a
|
|
|
|
|
missing engine would silently become a clean bill of health.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from collections.abc import Mapping, Sequence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from ..cpg.backend import CpgResult
|
|
|
|
|
from .ladder import Rung, Verdict
|
|
|
|
|
from .specs import TaintSpec
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-09 07:57:35 +02:00
|
|
|
def request_params(spec: TaintSpec, *, function: str = "", parameter_sources: bool = False) -> dict[str, object]:
|
|
|
|
|
"""The query parameters this arbiter sends. Shared with the batcher so there is one definition, not two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two copies of a parameter dict is precisely the duplication that produced five bugs of one shape in the
|
|
|
|
|
predecessor: a change made in one place and not its sibling.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
|
|
|
"sources": spec.sources,
|
|
|
|
|
"sinks": spec.sinks,
|
|
|
|
|
"sanitizers": spec.sanitizers,
|
|
|
|
|
"function": function,
|
|
|
|
|
"parameterSources": "true" if parameter_sources else "false",
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-08 12:56:13 +02:00
|
|
|
def verdict(cpg: CpgResult, spec: TaintSpec, *, function: str = "", parameter_sources: bool = False) -> Verdict | None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""The strongest verdict the taint query supports for ``spec`` in ``function``, or ``None`` to stay at suspicion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``parameter_sources`` additionally treats the labeled function's own parameters as untrusted. That is right
|
|
|
|
|
for a function-level pair, where the function boundary *is* the trust boundary, and wrong for a whole
|
|
|
|
|
repository, where most parameters carry internal values — so it is off by default and the caller opts in.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
2026-09-09 07:57:35 +02:00
|
|
|
rows = cpg.run("taint", request_params(spec, function=function, parameter_sources=parameter_sources))
|
2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
flows = _flows(rows, function=function)
|
2026-09-08 12:51:42 +02:00
|
|
|
# A sink whose *shape* is safe is the fix, not the bug. `execute(sql, params)` binds rather than
|
|
|
|
|
# interpolates and `printf("literal", x)` has a constant format string, so the flow that reaches them is
|
|
|
|
|
# not a vulnerability -- even though the taint path is identical to the vulnerable twin's. Dropping these
|
|
|
|
|
# is what lets the model distinguish a pair at all: measured on the injection slice, taint reachability
|
|
|
|
|
# alone entailed both sides of the canonical SQL pair and therefore arbitrated nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
flows = [flow for flow in flows if not _has_safe_shape(flow, spec)]
|
2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
if not flows:
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
2026-09-08 16:24:23 +02:00
|
|
|
# Parameter sources are a FALLBACK, never an override. When a modelled source reaches the sink, those
|
|
|
|
|
# flows are the evidence: a captured `res` parameter also reaching it unsanitized must not report a fix as
|
|
|
|
|
# still vulnerable on the strength of a flow that names no attacker input.
|
|
|
|
|
modelled = [flow for flow in flows if _from_modelled_source(flow, spec)]
|
|
|
|
|
considered = modelled or flows
|
|
|
|
|
unsanitized = [flow for flow in considered if not flow["sanitized"]]
|
|
|
|
|
# Deterministic by construction: a total order, then take the first. Nothing depends on engine ordering.
|
|
|
|
|
chosen = min(unsanitized or considered, key=lambda flow: _rank(flow, spec))
|
2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
rung = Rung.ENTAILED if not chosen["sanitized"] else Rung.CORROBORATED
|
|
|
|
|
return Verdict(rung=rung, family=spec.family, witness=_witness(chosen))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _flows(rows: object, *, function: str) -> list[dict[str, object]]:
|
|
|
|
|
"""The query's rows, filtered to the labeled function. A non-list (a failure) yields nothing."""
|
|
|
|
|
if not isinstance(rows, Sequence) or isinstance(rows, (str, bytes)):
|
|
|
|
|
return []
|
|
|
|
|
kept: list[dict[str, object]] = []
|
|
|
|
|
for row in rows:
|
|
|
|
|
if not isinstance(row, Mapping):
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
2026-09-08 16:24:23 +02:00
|
|
|
if function and not _in_scope(row, function):
|
2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
continue
|
2026-09-08 19:46:58 +02:00
|
|
|
kept.append(
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"sink": str(row.get("sink", "")),
|
|
|
|
|
"sinkArity": row.get("sinkArity"),
|
|
|
|
|
"sinkArg0Literal": row.get("sinkArg0Literal"),
|
|
|
|
|
"inLabeledScope": row.get("inLabeledScope"),
|
|
|
|
|
"sinkLine": str(row.get("sinkLine", "")),
|
|
|
|
|
"sinkMethod": str(row.get("sinkMethod", "")),
|
|
|
|
|
"source": str(row.get("source", "")),
|
|
|
|
|
"sanitized": bool(row.get("sanitized", False)),
|
|
|
|
|
"length": _as_int(row.get("length")),
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
return kept
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-08 12:51:42 +02:00
|
|
|
def _has_safe_shape(flow: Mapping[str, object], spec: TaintSpec) -> bool:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Does this flow end at a sink call written in the form the spec declares safe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only sinks named in ``safe_shape_sinks`` are subject to the test -- ``os.system(x)`` is not safe merely
|
|
|
|
|
because it takes one argument. A row that carries no shape fields (an engine that could not report arity)
|
|
|
|
|
is judged on the flow alone: unknown shape must never be read as a safe one.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
if not spec.safe_shape_sinks:
|
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
sink = str(flow.get("sink", ""))
|
|
|
|
|
if not any(name in sink for name in spec.safe_shape_sinks):
|
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
arity = flow.get("sinkArity")
|
|
|
|
|
literal = flow.get("sinkArg0Literal")
|
|
|
|
|
if arity is None and literal is None:
|
|
|
|
|
return False # shape unknown -> judge on the flow, never assume safety
|
|
|
|
|
bound = isinstance(arity, int | float) and int(arity) >= 2
|
|
|
|
|
constant_format = literal is True
|
|
|
|
|
return bound or constant_format
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
def _as_int(value: object) -> int:
|
|
|
|
|
return int(value) if isinstance(value, int | float) else 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-08 16:24:23 +02:00
|
|
|
def _in_scope(row: Mapping[str, object], function: str) -> bool:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Is this sink inside the labeled function, counting closures nested within it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JavaScript is callback-heavy, so the method containing a sink routinely is not the labeled function --
|
|
|
|
|
`fs.readFileSync` inside the callback passed to `fs.stat` has enclosing method `<lambda>0`. The query
|
|
|
|
|
decides containment by line range and reports it here; a row that carries no flag falls back to the name
|
|
|
|
|
comparison, because an engine that cannot report scope must not have its sinks silently treated as scoped.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
flag = row.get("inLabeledScope")
|
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(flag, bool):
|
|
|
|
|
return flag
|
|
|
|
|
return str(row.get("sinkMethod", "")) == function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _from_modelled_source(flow: Mapping[str, object], spec: TaintSpec) -> bool:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Does this flow start at something the source model names, rather than a bare captured parameter?"""
|
|
|
|
|
source = str(flow["source"])
|
|
|
|
|
return any(pattern in source for pattern in spec.sources)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _rank(flow: Mapping[str, object], spec: TaintSpec) -> tuple[int, int, str, str]:
|
|
|
|
|
"""A flow from a modelled source first, then shortest, then lexicographic — a total order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shortest alone picks the wrong witness once closures are in scope: a captured `res` reaches the sink in
|
|
|
|
|
three steps while the actual `req.url -> ... -> possibleFilename` path takes eleven, and reporting the
|
|
|
|
|
former names no attacker input at all. Naming a real source is what makes a witness evidence rather than
|
|
|
|
|
an assertion, so it outranks brevity.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
source = str(flow["source"])
|
|
|
|
|
rank_modelled = 0 if _from_modelled_source(flow, spec) else 1
|
|
|
|
|
return (rank_modelled, _as_int(flow["length"]), source, str(flow["sink"]))
|
2026-09-08 12:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _witness(flow: Mapping[str, object]) -> str:
|
|
|
|
|
line = flow.get("sinkLine") or "?"
|
|
|
|
|
return f"{flow['source']} -> {flow['sink']} (line {line}, {flow['length']} steps)"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-09 07:57:35 +02:00
|
|
|
__all__ = ["request_params", "verdict"]
|