docs: plain-English pass over the active specs

Ran the humanizer rules over 79 prose files in the active specs (brief,
design, requirements, research and narrative docs). Removed em dashes,
significance inflation, forced rule-of-three, bold-label list items and
filler. Skipped tasks.md checklists and the retired specs (harnessx-*,
openrouter-sast-harness, unseen-repo-evaluation).

Every number, path, command, hash and identifier was preserved: checked
each file against HEAD for drift in numbers, inline code and code fences,
zero drift across all 79 files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Marius Ciepluch
2026-10-12 18:16:41 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent b08f372022
commit 39a1873e5b
79 changed files with 1103 additions and 1103 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ feasibility gate. [Official CPG slicing documentation](https://docs.joern.io/cpg
2. **Separate claim from interruption.** Existing rungs describe analysis evidence. Hook admission
additionally requires evaluated capability, change attribution and actionability. This meets the
user's low-noise requirement without pretending an LLM confidence score proves a bug.
3. **Compare evidence, not just finding lists.** A missing base finding can mean truncated analysis.
3. **Compare evidence as well as finding lists.** A missing base finding can mean truncated analysis.
Targeted comparable base checks are required for novelty, including removed-guard cases.
4. **Adopt Git and the existing engine.** Build only the push transaction, cache and admission adapters.
Do not add an IR, database or service merely to describe future scale.