fix(push): a gap from another language partition no longer blocks admission

_blocking_degradations already exempted declared exclusions. It now also ignores a gap another
language partition raised, because a JavaScript file missing from the JavaScript graph cannot make a
PHP answer wrong. Treating it as though it could left a WordPress plugin -- PHP plus its admin
JavaScript, which is every plugin -- unable to admit a finding it had already established.

A gap that names no partition still reaches everything, and so does every gap when the claim own
language is unknown, because unknown scope is not evidence of independence. The control asserts all
four directions.

With this and the scan fixes, task 13.4 is verified on the subject that motivated it: PMPro completes
120 of 127 questions where it completed none, its 19 findings unchanged, and the seven still
unresolved are the JavaScript partition own questions, which is the correct answer.

1,420 tests pass, eighteen skipped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
This commit is contained in:
Marius Ciepluch
2026-09-21 13:50:38 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent d105d2f84a
commit a487d1dfb5
3 changed files with 51 additions and 7 deletions
+25 -6
View File
@@ -360,9 +360,28 @@ def _blocking_gaps(scan: ModelScanResult, *questions: QuestionIdentity) -> tuple
)
def _blocking_degradations(scan: ModelScanResult) -> tuple[str, ...]:
"""Degradations that undermine an answer. A declared exclusion is not one of them."""
return tuple(str(d.get("reason")) for d in scan.degradations if str(d.get("reason")) not in DECLARED_EXCLUSION_GAPS)
def _blocking_degradations(scan: ModelScanResult, *, language: str = "") -> tuple[str, ...]:
"""Degradations that undermine an answer. A declared exclusion is not one of them, and neither is a gap
another language partition raised.
A partitioned scan records a gap per graph. A JavaScript file missing from the JavaScript graph cannot
make a PHP answer wrong, and treating it as though it could is what left a WordPress plugin -- PHP plus
its admin JavaScript, which is every plugin -- unable to admit a finding it had already established.
Measured 2026-09-21: four build artefacts against 4,425 PHP regions.
Scope is read from the degradation's own partition. A gap that names none reaches everything, and so does
every gap when the claim's own language is unknown, because unknown scope is not evidence of independence.
"""
kept: list[str] = []
for item in scan.degradations:
reason = str(item.get("reason"))
if reason in DECLARED_EXCLUSION_GAPS:
continue
partition = str(item.get("census_language") or "")
if partition and language and partition != language:
continue
kept.append(reason)
return tuple(kept)
# A qualified callee: an identifier, optionally reached through `.`, `->` or `::`. Receiver
@@ -425,7 +444,7 @@ def dependency_gaps(
if scan is None:
continue
gaps.extend(gap for gap in (scan.scope.unresolved_boundaries if scan.scope else ()) if pertains(gap))
gaps.extend(_blocking_degradations(scan))
gaps.extend(_blocking_degradations(scan, language=op.question.language))
return tuple(dict.fromkeys(gaps))
@@ -611,7 +630,7 @@ def _compare_evidence(
and base.scope.population_complete
# A truncated base scan cannot establish absence, wherever it was truncated.
and all(question.reason == "tier_zero" for question in base.scope.deferred)
and not _blocking_degradations(base)
and not _blocking_degradations(base, language=op.question.language)
and required <= selected
and required <= answered
and {q.identity for q in base.question_outcomes} <= selected
@@ -632,7 +651,7 @@ def _compare_evidence(
# A bounded reachability on the head can hide further flows; it cannot invalidate
# the flow this finding was traced from, so it does not block the head's own claim.
or [gap for gap in _blocking_gaps(head, op.question) if not gap.startswith(REACHABILITY_BOUNDED)]
or _blocking_degradations(head)
or _blocking_degradations(head, language=op.question.language)
or not _valid_answer(head, op.question, head_ops)
or op.question not in {q.identity for q in head.scope.selected}
):