mirror of
https://github.com/norandom/OpenUltraSAST.git
synced 2026-10-19 13:10:03 +00:00
measure(independent): known-answer check of the verifier -- 11/15 sites, unstable verdicts, escalation costs more
Declared vulnerable sites: 11 of the 15 that were candidates are confirmed (8 at 3 steps, 3 more at 6). Missed: winml (a CORS config; the reachability question does not fit), FUXA, Budibase, Froxlor. Restart-based escalation is strictly worse than a straight 6-step budget: 88% of pgAdmin candidates used every step, so they paid 3 + 6 ($0.0201 per candidate vs $0.0139 baseline). Defaults are now 6 steps, no escalation. The cache order change did not lower the per-call cost ($0.002): the conversation prefix was already cached; 56% of prompt tokens are served from cache. The larger finding: on 180 pgAdmin candidates verified twice, 15 and 13 were flagged with only 2 in common. Verdicts on borderline candidates flip run to run, while the declared sites were found consistently. Precision needs agreement across runs or a second judgement, not a single pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Fable 5.1
parent
6df74cc3ae
commit
bad8c7ada4
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"measurement": "known-answer check of the sink verifier after 041d871 (context-first order, 3->6 restart escalation)",
|
||||
"declared_sites": {
|
||||
"found": 11,
|
||||
"of_cases_with_a_candidate_site": 15,
|
||||
"found_at_3_steps": [
|
||||
"pgadmin",
|
||||
"lmdeploy",
|
||||
"reactpress",
|
||||
"unleash",
|
||||
"medplum",
|
||||
"cct-studio x2",
|
||||
"gopay",
|
||||
"directorist"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"found_only_at_6": [
|
||||
"qwed",
|
||||
"contextforge",
|
||||
"groundhogg"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"missed": [
|
||||
"winml (config, question shape)",
|
||||
"fuxa",
|
||||
"budibase",
|
||||
"froxlor"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"usd": 0.283
|
||||
},
|
||||
"pgadmin_180_overlap": {
|
||||
"baseline_findings": 15,
|
||||
"check_findings": 13,
|
||||
"in_common": 2,
|
||||
"note": "verdicts on borderline candidates flip run to run; declared sites were stable"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cost": {
|
||||
"baseline_usd_per_candidate": 0.0139,
|
||||
"check_usd_per_candidate": 0.0201,
|
||||
"escalated_share": 0.88,
|
||||
"non_escalated_usd": 0.0038,
|
||||
"escalated_usd": 0.0222,
|
||||
"cache_share_of_prompt_tokens": 0.56,
|
||||
"per_call_usd": 0.002,
|
||||
"conclusion": "restart escalation is strictly worse than a straight 6-step budget; the cache was already effective within a conversation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"decision": "defaults set to --max-steps 6 --escalate-steps 0"
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user