marius/Open_Ultra_SAST
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/norandom/OpenUltraSAST.git synced 2026-11-14 02:08:18 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(spec) access-control-prover: design amendment -- resolution, resource-bound guards, programmatic registration

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Marius Ciepluch
2026-10-29 12:10:37 +01:00
parent 3de96c88f6
commit f09dc66592
3 changed files with 230 additions and 32 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.kiro/specs/access-control-prover/spec.json
+4 -4
View File
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
{
"feature_name": "access-control-prover",
"created_at": "2026-10-14T13:48:18Z",
"updated_at": "2026-10-29T10:45:00Z",
"updated_at": "2026-10-29T13:05:00Z",
"language": "en",
"phase": "requirements-generated",
"phase": "design-generated",
"approvals": {
"requirements": {"generated": true, "approved": false},
"requirements": {"generated": true, "approved": true},
"design": {"generated": true, "approved": false},
"tasks": {"generated": true, "approved": false}
},
"ready_for_implementation": false,
"depends_on": ["authorization-obligations", "valid-detection-benchmark", "hunter-learning-loop"],
"approval_note": "2026-10-14 maintainer directive in session: spec the prover and queue implementation with Codex (fast-track; the three gates were passed on that instruction, review the documents before the second delivery). 2026-10-29: requirements amended after the 2026-10-28 gates 1-5 measurements (trace resolution, programmatic entry facts, failure visibility); requirements await re-approval, then design and tasks must be revisited against the amendment before implementation resumes."
"approval_note": "2026-10-14 maintainer directive in session: spec the prover and queue implementation with Codex (fast-track; the three gates were passed on that instruction, review the documents before the second delivery). 2026-10-29: requirements amended after the 2026-10-28 gates 1-5 measurements (trace resolution, programmatic entry facts, failure visibility); requirements await re-approval, then design and tasks must be revisited against the amendment before implementation resumes. 2026-10-29 (later): maintainer instruction in session ('can you address the issues?') treated as requirements approval and as the directive to regenerate the design; design.md amended in merge mode against the amendment (resolution component, resource-bound and voter witnesses, programmatic Jetty registration, stale-anchor refusal, error reasons), tasks.md still to be regenerated after design approval."
}