_blocking_degradations already exempted declared exclusions. It now also ignores a gap another
language partition raised, because a JavaScript file missing from the JavaScript graph cannot make a
PHP answer wrong. Treating it as though it could left a WordPress plugin -- PHP plus its admin
JavaScript, which is every plugin -- unable to admit a finding it had already established.
A gap that names no partition still reaches everything, and so does every gap when the claim own
language is unknown, because unknown scope is not evidence of independence. The control asserts all
four directions.
With this and the scan fixes, task 13.4 is verified on the subject that motivated it: PMPro completes
120 of 127 questions where it completed none, its 19 findings unchanged, and the seven still
unresolved are the JavaScript partition own questions, which is the correct answer.
1,420 tests pass, eighteen skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
The runner handed every candidate the whole transaction's coverage reason list as
its unresolved dependencies, so admission always answered dependency_unresolved.
That list even included other candidates' comparison outcomes, so one unresolved
comparison anywhere marked every other claim as having an unresolved dependency.
Gaps are now attributed. A boundary carrying a question id counts only when that
question is in this candidate's required comparison scope, the same scope 10.2
established. A gap nothing attributed to any question always counts, because
unknown ownership is not evidence of independence. Integrity degradations count.
A declared exclusion, a correspondence ambiguity and a bounded reachability do
not, because each was already weighed against this specific claim: the first is a
scope choice, the second is decided per operation, and the third is decided per
claim by the comparison.
Found by the M1b production rerun rather than by the suite: the comparison reached
a correct new verdict and admission still rejected it for a dependency belonging
to unrelated questions. It is not an M1b exit blocker, since eligibility stays
disabled, but it would have blocked admission forever once capabilities qualify.
1,371 tests passed, nine skipped. Rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
The NodeGoat rerun after 10.4-10.6 showed both target questions completing, which
is what those tasks were for, but the comparison still reported
head_context_incomplete. Two checks inside comparison had not been updated with
the same distinction: any degradation blocked, and any scope boundary blocked.
A declared exclusion and a correspondence ambiguity both reached those checks. The
first is a scope choice rather than a failure to read the graph, and the second is
decided per operation since 10.3, so neither should block a claim. Both remain in
aggregate coverage. Integrity degradations, unknown ownership and every other
boundary still block, and bounded reachability is still filtered separately
because it blocks only claims resting on a flow not having been traced.
1,368 tests passed, nine skipped. Rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
dynamic_external_or_depth_context_unresolved was applied as though it invalidated
everything about a question. It does not. Bounded reachability can hide further
flows; it cannot invalidate a flow that was traced, and it cannot remove a call
from a structurally scoped enumeration.
At scan level the boundary is now recorded against its owning question without
demoting that question's answer. An unavailable context projection, an empty
context scope and an unreadable method extent are unknown ownership and still
demote.
In comparison it no longer blocks the head's own claim, since the finding rests
on a path that was actually traced, and no longer blocks an absence read off the
enumerated inventory. It still blocks every claim that rests on a flow not having
been traced, including the anchored source-connection branch, which now reports
base_reachability_bounded rather than silently passing.
The query declares the basis of its enumeration. A file- or nesting-scoped
question walks calls structurally, so an unresolved destination cannot remove one
from scope. Following the call graph makes the reachable set the scope, so the
same unresolved destination can shrink what was enumerated; that inventory cannot
establish absence while reachability is bounded, and says so.
One prior control asserted a question's own reachability gap blocks its own
claim. It is updated with its reason and split, so an own projection gap is still
proven to block while an own reachability gap no longer does.
1,362 tests passed, nine skipped. Rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
A taint answer reports traced flows, so an absent row means either that the
operation is not present or that no traced path reached it. Change comparison
needs that distinction to say a change introduced an operation, and reachability
is deliberately bounded, so the two can never be separated from flow rows alone.
That is why the veto guarding the confusion is permanently true on any real
Express application, and why it could be neither discharged nor safely removed.
The taint query now exports one row per operation it enumerated in scope, plus a
completion marker. The marker is what makes an empty inventory meaningful:
without it a scope that was never enumerated and a scope holding no such
operation are indistinguishable.
Comparison separates three outcomes on a changed line: the operation is present
in the base without a traced flow, which is a reachability statement and not
novelty; the operation is absent from an enumerated base, which establishes that
the change introduced it; or the base scope was never enumerated, which stays
explicitly unresolved. A malformed inventory row is not an empty inventory.
The arbiter now skips any row carrying a kind, so an inventory row cannot be
normalized into a flow with an empty source that names no attacker input.
Verified against the real engine on an authored two-revision JavaScript control:
the operation is enumerated on both sides, the base carries it with zero traced
flows, the zero-operation marker appears for an empty scope, and answers and
findings are unchanged. No new sink inference, alias resolver or second source
IR. 1,354 tests passed, nine skipped. Rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
Two vetoes M1a recorded were global where the evidence is local.
Comparison required every selected base question to complete, so one unsupported
family anywhere prevented an otherwise complete target comparison. Completeness
is now demanded over the required scope: the counterpart question plus the
dependencies the change context actually recorded for it. Every other gap stays
in aggregate coverage and is still reported, never discharged. An incomplete
counterpart, an incomplete recorded dependency, an unknown-ownership boundary
and a truncated base scan all still yield unknown.
Correspondence ambiguity was recorded file-wide and inherited by every question,
so repeated unchanged lines in one file invalidated every question in the
repository and blocked the whole transaction comparison. It is now decided per
operation by the correspondence classifier: an operation needing an ambiguous
anchor stays uncomparable, while a uniquely mapped or newly introduced operation
in the same file is unaffected. The mapping is still withheld and still reported.
On the NodeGoat case the ambiguity is on the target's own file, so file-level
scoping would not have been enough; only per-operation resolution is.
1,347 tests passed, nine skipped. No capability enabled; rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
M1a measured that a newly introduced operation sits on a changed line, has no
base line anchor, and therefore stayed unclassified even with every completeness
veto lifted. Establish absence over the complete counterpart answer instead of
over a line anchor.
Correspondence now reports why a head operation does not map: `changed_line`
inside a recorded head edit, `ambiguous` where several base lines could
correspond, or `unmapped` where no anchor exists. Only the first supports
reasoning about an introduced operation, and only when the base counterpart
answer is complete and contains no operation with that spelling.
Movement is matched on the operation spelling alone, so a benign identifier
rename that changes only the source text reads as movement rather than a new
flow. The existing rename control caught that; the key was too brittle before.
One prior control is superseded and updated with its reason: a new operation on
a changed line in a comparable existing file is now new rather than unknown.
Movement, ambiguity, unmapped operations, discharged or unentailed claims and an
incomplete or failed base all remain unknown.
1,337 tests passed, nine skipped. No capability enabled; rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
