Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 3bd844055c fix(config): report every permissive setting in a file, not the first one
NodeGoat's server.js configures a permissive session at line 78 and disables template
auto-escaping at line 135, both inside the same function. The arbiter returned one verdict per
question, so the escaping defect that task 14.3 added was detected on every run and reported on
none: which of two real defects a contributor saw depended on where in the file it sat.

Configuration now returns one verdict per setting whose value the model could read. The pipeline
already emitted one finding per entailed answer, so this arbiter was the only place still folding
them to one.

Three boundaries are drawn rather than assumed.

- A setting whose value is COMPUTED stays one verdict per region. That band is a question for the
  judge rather than a finding, and returning every undecided setting would multiply model calls
  for claims the graph did not establish.
- A call carrying two permissive literals is one finding. cors({origin: true, credentials: true})
  is one misconfiguration, not two.
- Config verdicts now carry a path:line:function location. Without one they shared the region's
  identity and the deduplicator kept a single finding, so the plural answer collapsed straight
  back to one. That is the same gap dominance carried until its findings stopped arriving with no
  line at all.

Dominance is left answering once per region, and that is settled rather than pending: its claim is
that a region contradicts itself, so the region is the unit and a second verdict would restate the
same inconsistency. The pipeline now says so where it used to call this a known gap.

Measured: NodeGoat's config_secrets goes from one finding to two, server.js:78 for the session and
server.js:135 for the disabled escaping, with the applied marked.setOptions fix between them
staying silent. VAmPI is unchanged and no other family moved.

1,417 tests pass, seventeen skipped; thirteen Joern-gated query tests pass in the image.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-09-20 16:30:04 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 f31ef862a7 fix(output-encoding): ask about the server half, and say what the family cannot decide
The census recorded this family completing 44 questions on a Node application and finding
nothing, which is what a client-only vocabulary must do there: all six declared sinks were DOM
sinks. NodeGoat's cross-site scripting is server-side.

Decision: the family asks about a value reaching a rendering call, and states in its own
declaration that it cannot decide template-mediated escaping. Whether res.render is safe depends
on the engine's autoescape setting and on the template's markup, neither of which is at the
call, so res.render is not a sink and the family's limits field says so. A new CWE-79 sink
covers res.write, res.end, res.send and the response.* spellings; res.json stays out because an
application/json body is not a document.

Template auto-escaping is claimed where its evidence is, as a configuration defect:
swig.setDefaults, nunjucks.configure and marked.setOptions are security settings now.

It establishes a finding: app/routes/research.js:25, model_entailed,
`req.query.url + req.query.symbol -> res.write(body)`. The handler fetches a URL the caller
chooses and writes the response body into a text/html response, so the document served from
this origin is the attacker's. The record states how coarse the step is: the path from url to
body runs through the client's callback parameter, which the graph treats as reachable from the
call's arguments, so the conclusion rests on the call's semantics rather than on what the graph
established. Five of seven families now establish findings.

Four defects were found on the way, three of them false positives this change would otherwise
have shipped.

- The permissive-value set was shared across every setting, while a boolean's polarity belongs
  to the setting: true leaves the door open in cors({origin: true}) and closes it in
  swig.setDefaults({autoescape: true}). Adding the template engines would have reported the fix
  as the defect on the line that offers it. ConfigSpec now carries per-setting values, and
  Jinja2's Environment moved out of Python's shared list for the same latent reason.
- config.sc matched a dotted setting on its trailing segment alone, so marked.setOptions would
  have claimed an editor's setOptions. dominance.sc already required the qualifier.
- taint.sc asked its flow query of every argument including the receiver at index 0. On a
  response sink the receiver is the response object, so res.end() -- which takes no data -- was
  reported exactly like the res.write(body) two lines above it. Flows now use the real
  arguments, as arity already did.
- The arbiter sorted a file's settings by line number as TEXT, so line 126 preceded line 78 and
  which setting a file reported depended on the spelling of its line numbers.

Template escaping disabled at server.js:135 is detected, measured model_entailed against the
real query and the real arbiter, and still not reported: the arbiter returns one verdict per
question and that file has an earlier permissive setting. Task 14.6 carries it rather than
hiding it.

1,415 tests pass, thirteen skipped; nine Joern-gated query tests pass in the image.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-09-19 20:38:39 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 177c7f3719 feat(model): first repository measurement, and the four things it found
contributor-scan 2.2. VAmPI at a pinned commit, scanned whole rather than
as excerpts, with benchmarks/repos/measure.py recording build time, query
time, arbitration time, peak memory, cost, unjudged regions, and whether
each known vulnerability was found and at which rung.

The corpus could not have found any of this. Every defect below needs a
repository to become visible, and three of them were invisible behind a
passing test suite.

**The batch path was unreachable.** query_batch was implemented, tested and
committed while CpgResult exposed only `run`, so the driver's capability
check found nothing and fell back to one JVM per region-family: the first
attempt at this measurement ran eighteen minutes on 520 lines, issuing
`--param function=` one at a time. Every test called query_batch directly,
so none of them noticed. CpgResult now carries run_batch and a test asserts
the capability is reachable through the object the driver is handed.
The earlier 275s->106s improvement attributed to batching came from region
deduplication alone.

**The budget stopped free work.** It bounds model calls, but was enforced
by breaking the region loop -- spending a paid limit to stop unpaid CPG
arbitration. 6 of 22 regions were examined and VAmPI's BOLA, which the
graph entails for nothing, was never reached. It now withholds the judge
only. 22 of 22 regions arbitrated, 17 counted as regions_unasked (silent
because unaffordable is not silent because decided), and the BOLA is
entailed by the model layer.

**A region with no function asked about the whole repository.** Sending
function="" matched every hit in the tree and the driver attributed that
answer to whoever asked: one `host='0.0.0.0'` in app.py became eight
identical entailed findings in eight files that do not contain it. Queries
now carry the region's file. Entailed findings 14 -> 7, query time
70.9s -> 40.9s. The single-request form stays unscoped so the committed
pair measurements remain reproducible.

**The JVM had no heap bound.** Joern claimed a quarter of physical RAM and
runs were killed under memory pressure at different points, so the numbers
described the host rather than the engine. -J-Xmx2048m by default,
OPENULTRASAST_CPG_HEAP_MB to raise it.

Also: arbitrated findings carried `function:line` where the report layer
read `path:line`, so every entailed finding reached a contributor with a
function name where its file belonged; and the witness line was parsed by
splitting on a comma, which produced sites like
`config.py:17): permissive literal '0.0.0.0':?`.

Reading: GO on one CPG per repository -- 6.2s to build, 177s end to end,
869MB, $0.0067, nothing infeasible. NO-GO on region-scoped taint as the
only shape: VAmPI's SQL injection runs from a handler parameter into a
function in another module, and a per-function region sees neither end.
That is the ordinary shape of a real injection bug, so it is recorded as
task 2.4 along with three smaller defects this run exposed.

Gates byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-09 08:46:21 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 c35426e186 perf(model): one Joern invocation per query kind, not one per region
JVM startup dominated a scan: a call per region per family put a ten-line
file at 275s over three regions, and would have put a thousand regions at
roughly fifty hours. The queries themselves are milliseconds once the CPG
is loaded, so the cost was almost entirely process starts.

scan_repository() is now collect -> batch -> arbitrate. The three .sc
scripts accept a `requests` JSON map and answer all of them in one run,
keeping the single-request form so the committed measurements stay
reproducible byte-for-byte. Arbiters are untouched: each is handed a
CpgResult whose `run` returns its own prefetched rows.

The batcher builds parameters by calling request_params() extracted from
taint.py, dominance.py and config_value.py rather than reconstructing
them. A second copy that drifts from the arbiter's is the exact shape of
the five family-assumption bugs the predecessor spec spent a session
finding; there is now one definition per family and the batcher borrows
it.

Regions are also deduplicated by (path, function), collapsing the
nameless entry-point rows that were producing `model:injection:?:10`.

Measured on the same ten-line file: 275s -> 106s, three duplicate
findings -> one `model:injection:ping:10`, rung unchanged at
model_entailed. Gates byte-identical.

Server mode is recorded as task 2.3, deliberately sequenced after the
repository measurement: whether the remaining ~100s floor is worth a
process model, a weakened subprocess seam and a Scala-evaluating HTTP
endpoint depends on a build-time-to-query-time ratio only 2.2 produces.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-09 07:57:35 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 db3db6056d feat(model-grounded-detection): widen the settings table, wire the weak-algorithm arm
Two things, and a finding that says neither fixes the pairs that prompted them.

The settings table was Flask/FastAPI-shaped (CORS, set_cookie, app.run) while
the corpus contains aiohttp and Django applications, so three config_secrets
pairs contained no modelled security setting at all. Added aiohttp's
session_setup and cookie storages and Django's SECURE_* / DEBUG settings: 8
calls to 24.

And config_secrets spans three abstractions while only one was wired -- a
permissive setting VALUE. Weak algorithm CHOICE (CWE-326/327) is a different
thing: the danger is the algorithm NAMED, not a flag left open. Its data has
been sitting on the sink facts as `weak_literals` since before this feature and
nothing read it. Both abstractions read the same literal, so the arm is small:
hashlib.new("md5") is now entailed and hashlib.new("sha256") is not.

The finding: the three silent config pairs are CORPUS DEFECTS, not model gaps.
Measured similarity 23%, 45% and 53% -- dsvpwa-dsvpwa-main pairs `def main()`
against `def run(self, handler)`, a different function entirely. No settings
table can make those split, and it is worth saying so rather than letting the
work imply otherwise. The table gap was real and worth closing on its own
merits; it just is not why those pairs are silent.

734 passing, mypy/ruff clean, gates byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-08 18:43:33 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 4f8f590b93 fix(model-grounded-detection): type the config literals list
mypy could not see that row["literals"] is a list on an object-valued dict.
Narrowed at the use site rather than widened at the boundary.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-08 15:01:08 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 d9ceeb6a09 feat(model-grounded-detection): 4.2 constant abstraction, the third arbiter form
A configuration bug has no flow to follow and no guard to dominate.
CORS(app, origins="*") is dangerous because of the value it is SET TO, so the
arbiter evaluates the setting's arguments against the closed permissive set in
the obligation facts -- the third form beside taint reachability and guard
dominance, and the one Req 6.3 names.

  ENTAILED      a security setting is passed a literal in the permissive set
  CORROBORATED  the argument is computed, so constant abstraction cannot decide
                it -- that residual is the judge's, never silently "safe"
  (none)        every literal is outside the set, or the call is not a setting

Two Joern node-shape bugs, both found by running it and both of the same class
as group 2's receiver bug -- the graph's indexing is not what the source text
suggests:

  * a keyword argument (`origins="*"`) is an assignment-shaped node, so
    isLiteral is false on the argument itself and the literal sits in its
    subtree; literals are collected from the argument's AST now.
  * Joern indexes the receiver at 0, positional arguments from 1, and NAMED
    arguments at -1. Settings are configured overwhelmingly by keyword, so
    argumentIndexGt(0) -- correct when counting arity for the taint shape test
    -- dropped exactly the arguments that matter and every keyword-configured
    setting read as "computed".

Live, deterministic, zero model calls:
  create_app -> model_entailed  CORS(app, origins = "*"): permissive literal "*"
  safe_app   -> no finding      (origins = "https://app.example")

All three arbiter forms now work against a real CPG: taint reachability for the
flow families, guard dominance for absence, constant abstraction for config.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-08 15:00:41 +02:00