Ran the humanizer rules over 79 prose files in the active specs (brief,
design, requirements, research and narrative docs). Removed em dashes,
significance inflation, forced rule-of-three, bold-label list items and
filler. Skipped tasks.md checklists and the retired specs (harnessx-*,
openrouter-sast-harness, unseen-repo-evaluation).
Every number, path, command, hash and identifier was preserved: checked
each file against HEAD for drift in numbers, inline code and code fences,
zero drift across all 79 files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
Maintainer 2026-10-04: the safety net is for unseen code and the A/B tests exist
to prove the approach generalises; infrastructure work had drifted from that.
Runs are designed for AX on kube-ax, kind is the fallback.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
ops/ax/probe-placement.sh scales ousast-pool to one worker, applies probe-pool
(1 x 2 CPU / 3Gi, the already-built ateom-gvisor image, no ko build), runs one
model-free repo-facts Task requesting 2560Mi (limit 3Gi) and one requesting
256Mi, records `kubectl ate get workers -o json` after each resume, and removes
everything it created. Live on kind: both actors landed on the 1536Mi
ousast-pool worker (status.allocated.actors=1 there, 0 on probe-pool) ->
placement: any. design.md section 4 records the outcome and the fallback group
5 must take (an engine atespace with engine-pool as its only pool if Substrate
scopes pools by atespace; else a plain Kubernetes Job on k3s). Evidence under
benchmarks/measurements/2026-10-02-k8s-01-profile/probe/.
Gates (tree identical to 1.4 in src/ and tests/; ops/ gains the probe script,
which the literal scan covers): pytest 2010 passed, 42 skipped, exit 0; ruff
check 0; ruff format 0; mypy 0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
