The census recorded this family completing 44 questions on a Node application and finding
nothing, which is what a client-only vocabulary must do there: all six declared sinks were DOM
sinks. NodeGoat's cross-site scripting is server-side.
Decision: the family asks about a value reaching a rendering call, and states in its own
declaration that it cannot decide template-mediated escaping. Whether res.render is safe depends
on the engine's autoescape setting and on the template's markup, neither of which is at the
call, so res.render is not a sink and the family's limits field says so. A new CWE-79 sink
covers res.write, res.end, res.send and the response.* spellings; res.json stays out because an
application/json body is not a document.
Template auto-escaping is claimed where its evidence is, as a configuration defect:
swig.setDefaults, nunjucks.configure and marked.setOptions are security settings now.
It establishes a finding: app/routes/research.js:25, model_entailed,
`req.query.url + req.query.symbol -> res.write(body)`. The handler fetches a URL the caller
chooses and writes the response body into a text/html response, so the document served from
this origin is the attacker's. The record states how coarse the step is: the path from url to
body runs through the client's callback parameter, which the graph treats as reachable from the
call's arguments, so the conclusion rests on the call's semantics rather than on what the graph
established. Five of seven families now establish findings.
Four defects were found on the way, three of them false positives this change would otherwise
have shipped.
- The permissive-value set was shared across every setting, while a boolean's polarity belongs
to the setting: true leaves the door open in cors({origin: true}) and closes it in
swig.setDefaults({autoescape: true}). Adding the template engines would have reported the fix
as the defect on the line that offers it. ConfigSpec now carries per-setting values, and
Jinja2's Environment moved out of Python's shared list for the same latent reason.
- config.sc matched a dotted setting on its trailing segment alone, so marked.setOptions would
have claimed an editor's setOptions. dominance.sc already required the qualifier.
- taint.sc asked its flow query of every argument including the receiver at index 0. On a
response sink the receiver is the response object, so res.end() -- which takes no data -- was
reported exactly like the res.write(body) two lines above it. Flows now use the real
arguments, as arity already did.
- The arbiter sorted a file's settings by line number as TEXT, so line 126 preceded line 78 and
which setting a file reported depended on the spelling of its line numbers.
Template escaping disabled at server.js:135 is detected, measured model_entailed against the
real query and the real arbiter, and still not reported: the arbiter returns one verdict per
question and that file has an earlier permissive setting. Task 14.6 carries it rather than
hiding it.
1,415 tests pass, thirteen skipped; nine Joern-gated query tests pass in the image.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
contributor-scan 2.16, implementing the approved Req 5.6. `c/memory`
scored zero true positives across 89k lines of C and three distinct
classes of false one, for a structural reason: it models string CALLS and
libpng overflows through arithmetic.
The task allowed retiring the family. Kept, scoped and stated instead --
`strcpy` misuse is real in plenty of C and the family earns its place for
that. Retiring it would have removed the disclosure along with the
coverage, leaving a C scan silent for a reason nobody could read.
**Its own description was the quiet-failure risk.** It claimed "bounds,
lifetime, arithmetic", which is exactly what it does not decide. It now
names the APIs it models, and a new `limits` field in families.toml says
what it cannot: an overflow expressed as an index, a pointer offset, or a
memcpy whose size is computed -- which is how most real C overflows are
written, and how every one of libpng's is.
A limit recorded in a fact table nobody reads is no better than silence, so
the report renders it. **What was analysed** lists every family offered to
a region whether or not it found anything, because a family that ran and
reported nothing is the case a reader is most likely to misread, and it
states plainly that silence means no fact table covered the code rather
than that the code is safe.
The counts are derived from the fact tables the arbiter actually used, so
they cannot drift from what the engine looked for; only the limit sentence
is authored, because "cannot decide an overflow expressed as an index" is a
statement about an abstraction and no table can produce it.
A C scan that finds nothing now says:
| c | `memory` | 121 | 9 |
**`memory` (c)** — Models CALLS, not arithmetic...
Gates byte-identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Task 1.1. Ten families are the only key that routes work and scores a pair;
CWE ids and mechanism ids are attributes reached through a family. Each family
names what can confirm a claim in it: a sandbox canary for injection, file path
and deserialization, static corroboration for access control, nothing for the
rest. The unknown family carries the mechanisms that span families and the
weaknesses this project deliberately does not target, so a declined row is
visible instead of silently unresolved.
Every labeled corpus weakness resolves, no weakness id is claimed twice, and
every mechanism in the closed vocabulary belongs to exactly one family. Open
redirect joins server-side request forgery under one untrusted-destination
family because both are untrusted input choosing a request destination; that
places 34 real rows instead of discarding them. The relation lookup answers
same, parent-child, lateral or fabricated, and abstention earns no partial
credit: unknown against a real family is lateral.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
