Maintainer's finding of 2026-10-14 recorded in hunter-learning-loop (a dated section that overrides the shape
annotations as the model's input), its design (amendment pointing to the prover's trace) and the steering
overview's current state.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Opus agent delivery under spec access-control-prover, requirement 10. `semantic/cfg.py` builds a control-flow
graph per function from the syntax tree (if/else, switch arms, loops, try/catch/finally, return, throw, break,
continue, exit, assert) with dominators and a per-line control context, and leaves a function without a graph
rather than a wrong one. `obligations/cfg_dominance.py::CfgDominance` discharges a statement guard only when it
lies on every path to the operation and the operation is unreachable from its failing arm; a predicate whose
result nothing consumes is `value_only` and never discharges; router, decorator and earlier-hop witnesses behave
as before; without a graph the order rule applies and `cfg_unavailable` is recorded. The trace's guards carry
`relation` and `effect`, the trace carries `operation_context`; Java parameter lists carry names only; a
handler-named operation's arguments are the handler's parameters. The checker's default stays order-based.
Smoke on the 23 fix changes: 15 caught, 55 of 93 locations, precision 15 of 15, no failure, no change over
120 s (unchanged from delivery B). Gate: 3575 tests pass; the reserved-repository guard passes on the export.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Raised by the implementing agent: the design named only exits on the failing arm; if (can(x)) { op(); } is the
common shape and the operation is unreachable from the failing arm there too.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Requirement 10, the structural control-flow graph per function and CfgDominance behind the existing protocol,
tasks 4.4 and 4.5. Textual order stays the checker's default; the prover selects control flow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
The maintainer's correction: counts over a function, language or framework carry nothing about safety; the
object a decision model may see is the path from an attacker-reachable entry to a protected operation, with the
checks on it in control-flow order and the provenance of the operation's arguments. Requirement 9, the trace
contract and tasks 4.2 and 4.3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Marius Ciepluch