Reverts f04a839 on its own measurement. The seven-class profile rerun recorded
joern_parse_census_incomplete on 12 transactions: the faster build was rejected by
its own census gate and the frontend plus overlay pass ran as well, so those
transactions paid two engine starts instead of one. Every workload kept the same
p50 and the verdict stayed NO-GO.
The cause is an asymmetric gate. The frontend path is not census-gated at build
time, so whatever it produces is accepted, while the joern-parse path was gated and
the same shortfall rejected it. Holding the new path to a standard the old one
never has to meet guarantees the fallback fires. The probe tree and the
materialized push snapshot also differ, so equivalence on the checkout did not
transfer to the real path.
What still stands is the underlying timing fact, measured under the production
retention environment on identical graphs, same 44 files, 579 methods, file names,
overlays, Gruntfile and eighteen test files: 11.0 s against 21.0 s. JavaScript does
pay two engine starts where every other language pays one. A future attempt needs a
gate both paths are held to, or a direct comparison against what the frontend would
produce, and must be measured in the push path rather than on a checkout.
The profile also names the remaining cost plainly: a changed-code transaction
spends its budget before any query runs, head build 25.2 s of a 30 s deadline with
query time 0.0 s. Building one new graph per push is the cost, not querying it.
1,401 tests passed, nine skipped. Rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
JavaScript was the only language paying two engine starts: the declared frontend
and then a separate overlay pass. joern-parse applies the overlays itself. On the
pinned Node tree that is 11.0 s against 21.0 s.
The declared frontend stays as the fallback, because it is what the versioned
retention adaptation and the explicit exclusion policy run through, and the census
decides per build: a graph that does not hold every readable declared file is
rebuilt through the frontend rather than trusted. Exclusions keep the frontend path
outright.
Measured under the production retention environment, both paths produce the same 44
files, the same 579 methods, the same file names, the same five overlays, the
Gruntfile and all eighteen first-party test files, with no file present in one
graph and missing from the other.
My first measurement did not establish that. It ran without the retention
environment, both paths dropped to 25 files, and the apparent equivalence was two
runs discarding the same things. The existing control named for that decision
failed against the change built on it, which is exactly what it is for; the
evidence was wrong, not the control. That control now asserts the intent directly:
the faster path is tried first, and a short census rebuilds through the frontend.
1,401 tests passed, nine skipped. A build saving is not the latency gate; the
profile rerun decides that. Rollout stays NO-GO.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
