Renamed from detector-optimizer: the brief's own conclusion is that the
optimizer is not the next thing to build, and a spec should be named for what
it delivers.
Seven requirements, 37 criteria. The load-bearing ones:
Req 1 -- candidates come from the semantic IR, never the pattern ruleset,
and the enumerator's ceiling is published as the limit on recall. Measured
before building: ruleset 12.1%, IR 96.6%.
Req 2 -- one bounded typed question per candidate, no tools, no choice of
what to look at, and a test asserts two runs make an identical sequence of
model calls.
Req 3 is the maintainer's emphasis and it decides acceptance. The slices
harvested from real projects decide; hand-written vibe-py is a development
slice that cannot on its own justify a change; a change that improves vibe-py
and regresses a deciding slice is rejected by name; and the overfitting gap
-- 83.3% against 44.4% at baseline -- is published beside every headline
number. The candidate ceiling is measured separately on real-world slices,
because their functions are larger and the enumerator's behaviour there is
not implied by its behaviour on teaching code.
Req 5 -- the K-run and noise-floor machinery is re-measured against the
constrained detector and deleted if the floor collapses, naming the
learning-harness requirements that would be amended.
Not approved; design not started.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
learning-harness divides cleanly. The measurement layer stands and is worth
more than before -- it is what made a $0.23 experiment able to answer 'is
our own instability structural?'. What was answering the wrong question:
Req 3.5's K (an ensemble of distinct search procedures, not a repeated
measurement), Req 8.2's noise floor (it measures how often an unconstrained
search reaches the sink, so the regression budget grows with the search's own
wandering), Req 9.5's acceptance rule, and the sign test added this session.
And the highest-leverage change in either spec turns out not to be a prompt,
a lever or an optimizer: stop asking the model to locate the sink. 555 grep
calls against 71 entry_points, while the CST and the entry-point mapper
already know where the sinks are.
Limits stated in the brief: twelve pairs, one family, one model; the
high-similarity bucket is two run pairs and its 0% is decoration.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Twelve injection pairs, both sides, K=5, temperature 0, thinking disabled,
recording every tool call. $0.23.
The statistic I designed for could not be computed: across 120 runs there was
not one repeated trajectory -- 4.67 and 4.92 distinct trajectories per side
out of 5, and 78 distinct tool-name sequences ignoring arguments entirely.
The detector is not sampling one measurement five times; it is running five
different investigations and voting on the results.
As a gradient the relationship is monotone: runs whose trajectories were
similar (>=0.75 Jaccard) disagreed 0% of the time, mid-similarity 4.2%,
low-similarity 30.9%.
Three more facts. The search is grep: 555 grep_repo calls against 181
read_file, 71 entry_points, 43 find_refs, 13 read_definition -- the model is
guessing patterns to locate sinks the CST and the entry-point mapper already
know. All the instability is on the vulnerable side; every pair produced
exactly one finding set on the fixed side, so the noise is in detection and
none of it in false positives. And findings converge much more than
trajectories do: 78 trajectories, one to three finding sets per pair.
The floor is therefore not measuring uncertainty about a question. It is
measuring how often an unconstrained search happens to reach the sink.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
The harness treats the detector as a black box emitting a noisy scalar, and
K runs, majority voting, the measured floor, the regression budget and the
sign test all follow from that. It is the stance you take when you cannot
see inside what you are measuring, and we can.
Temperature is already 0 and thinking is disabled, and 11 of 20 injection
pairs still disagree with themselves. The freedom is in the trajectory --
which files get read, which greps get run -- and we built statistics to
average over it instead of removing it.
Three DSPy constructs attack the source: constraints enforced as predicates
at generation time (we already compute every one of them, after the fact, at
scoring time), typed decomposition of the single ReAct loop into steps whose
deterministic parts we already answer without a model, and best-of-N against
a checkable reward instead of a majority vote that discards the
disagreement. The cheaper the detector model, the more of the return sits
there and the less in prompt evolution -- the opposite of the order this
brief first proposed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
SIMBA ranks instances by max-to-min score gap across variants, which turns
our noise floor from an obstacle into an instance sampler: the 11 injection
pairs that disagree with themselves are the pairs where a rule change can
flip an outcome. Its two alternating strategies -- append a demo, append a
rule -- are the split our levers already have.
GEPA's reflection meta-prompt is a specification for the feedback function,
not just a prompt: it asks the reflector to extract domain facts the model
cannot re-derive later, which means feedback must carry which sink, which
span and which side leaked, not a verdict.
And the finding that outranks both: GEPA splits a trainset, SIMBA batches 32.
Injection has 12 train teachers. These algorithms are sample-efficient in
rollouts, not in instances, and they will not shortcut a corpus of twelve.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
The learning harness built the measurement honestly and then hill-climbed on
it by hand. Four review rounds' worth of defects in that loop were defects of
its shape, not its code.
Read from GEPA's Algorithm 1 and 2 rather than from a summary, three things
bear directly on ours: the acceptance gate is deliberately cheap and noisy,
because the Pareto frontier -- not the gate -- is what protects against a bad
accept; selection is stochastic and diversity-preserving, which is what stops
the search collapsing onto one lineage; and the expensive full evaluation is
spent only on candidates that already passed the cheap gate.
Two consequences for us are honesty findings, not performance ones. Our
acceptance rule reads the holdout every round, so repeated rounds overfit the
test set -- the same leak class this project already measured once, one level
up. And the proposer is handed a score where the published work hands it
textual feedback from the evaluation trace, which our evaluator produces and
then discards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Round zero and one evolve round run end to end with the scripted client over
the whole vibe-py slice: per-family and per-slice blocks, twins out by
reason, a floor each, a proposal applied and reverted byte for byte, the
sweep reporting zero negative flips, the rejected version archived. The only
thing the live run adds is a detector that can see.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Measured on the corpus under the split and review-tier rules, access_control
has 1 train teacher and 4 holdout pairs: every agent-vfc row sits at tier
`title` and the vibe-py absence rows that could teach are trap pairs whose
two sides are different handlers, so the train split teaches zero obligation
shapes. injection has 12 teachers and 10 holdout pairs, the only family with
enough train evidence to tell a real change from noise.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Three defects, two of them the same shape as ones already rejected once:
- The meta-agent proposer still could not propose. `MetaAgent(inner_model=)`
takes a ModelConfig; it was handed a model name, a `# type: ignore` hid
that from mypy, and a bare `except Exception` turned the resulting
AttributeError into `meta_agent_failed` -- which reads exactly like the
model declining. The composition is now a seam a test can pin, and a
construction error is re-raised rather than reported as a quiet round.
- `ousast pairs --hunter` crashed in its documented form: the K floor landed
with `--k-runs` still defaulting to 1. The covering test always passed
`--k-runs 4`, which is why nothing noticed.
- 28 rows (12% of the corpus) resolved a span on the vulnerable side and
none on the fixed side, so every fixed-side finding read as outside the
labeled function and the pair scored as silence whatever the detector
said. `fix_function` now reaches the catalog and the scorer, and the
generator derives it from the fixed excerpt for the 25 trap rows that
never declared one. Measured after: 0 rows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
The three gate outputs are captured at 71efc9c -- the commit before the
first line of this feature -- and a test reproduces them byte for byte in
both matrices. Byte-identity was something a reviewer checked by hand
against a worktree; it is now mechanical and runs in CI.
Six absences are each exercised once with the reason they record: HarnessX,
the chat endpoint (the run still writes its artifact), the family
configurations, the network for pointer pairs, the semantic extra (named,
not guessed), and the sandbox -- so a claim nothing could run is not
confused with a claim that failed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
The catalog generator fills `fix_date` from the recipe at the precision the
recipe has -- a full ISO day when one was recorded, otherwise the year.
Every harvested recipe carries a year and almost none carries a day, and
writing `-01-01` would turn a year into a claim about a month. A row counts
as post-cutoff only when its earliest possible date is after the cutoff, so
a coarse date can under-claim the clean slice but never over-claim it.
Each family now reports the same numbers over the rows fixed after the
cutoff, beside the whole number and never instead of it, with the undated
count on its own line. Without a configured cutoff every scoreboard says so
rather than inventing one: guessing a model's training cutoff and then
publishing a contamination number from the guess would be worse than
reporting none.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
The five byte-identical vibe-py twins now say so in the catalog instead of
only hashing to it, and a declared limit that names one of the unscorable
vocabulary's own reasons keeps that spelling, so `identical_twin` stays one
fact. Leave-one-out over vibe-py consequently runs on 30 rows, not 35.
The difficulty check measures three axes the corpus varies on: binding hops
from the identity source to the constrained use, registration distance, and
guard distance. Measured first, and it failed: the shared obligations
fixture reached (1, 0, 2) where the vibe-py absence rows reach (5, 2, 2).
Every fixture handler carried its own route decorator, so nothing in the
suite exercised a handler registered from another document and no binding
chain was longer than one hop -- the checker was passing on a simpler world
than the one it meets. `from_spec` closes that with the connexion shape
those rows really have. The verdict is committed beside the numbers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Eight of nine group-3 tasks were rejected. Each defect was hiding a number,
and the numbers are why the loop was not learning:
- The fixed side was judged against the *vulnerable* side's function
ranges. 191 of 227 pairs with a resolvable labeled span (84%) have
different spans on the two sides, so a leak was recorded as silence,
always in the direction that flatters Youden.
- Round zero measured every family with the generalist. `family:unknown`
earns no credit against any real family, so every family but `unknown`
baselined at a structural zero and every noise floor with it.
- The cross-family sweep counted absolute failures instead of negative
flips. On a corpus where most pairs fail at round zero that rejects
every round for damage it did not do. Unscorable rows voted too.
- K runs was declared and never threaded; `pairs --k-runs` was parsed and
discarded, and its only test grepped `--help`.
- The meta-agent proposer was a stub, so `learning round` could never
propose anything. It now composes MetaAgent.evolve against a scratch
copy of the family directory, and `--proposals FILE` runs a recorded
sequence offline.
- `refused_holdout` was a vocabulary word no code path could produce, and
the covering test accepted either outcome.
- Cost was metered once, after everything had been paid for; a stage that
raised left no record at all.
- The corrected lever number was published beside the earlier one rather
than in place of it, and the test named for that property never checked.
- Refusals were `continue` statements: `Refusal.degradation()` existed and
nothing called it. A train-split identical twin was reported as
`split:train`, which is untrue.
Test repairs that each changed a number: two split tests measured an
`x = 1` fixture that teaches nothing whatever the rule says; two CLI
scoreboard tests asserted against all-zero output produced by a stub that
answers twice and puts its finding outside the labeled function.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Eight of the ten vendored access-control rows had no named handler at all,
so every one of them would have scored `missing_context` forever rather
than as a detector miss. After the re-harvest nine are named and the tenth
states its reason.
The handler-context mode now carries the class its framework registers,
multi-line decorators, and commented-out guards -- `#@token_required`
above a ThreatByte handler is the entire bug. Where the registration lives
in another document (connexion's `operationId`, an express router), a
recipe names `context = [...]`, the harvester writes that stanza per side,
and the pair materializes both files at their repository-relative paths so
the entry-point mapper sees the layout the project has. `harvest_recipe`
fetches every blob before the first write and the driver takes `--report`,
so a failed fetch leaves a reviewed excerpt exactly as it was.
Two defects the re-harvest exposed: `.mjs` was not a known suffix, so the
one pair vendored as an ES module had no file target at all; and
`_python_route_access` matched auth words inside decorator prose, reading
`@ns.doc(description='... without proper authorization checks')` as a
guard. Recorded in the hygiene artifact: nine of the ten duplicate groups
sit on both sides of the split, which the repository-level split cannot
see.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
The maintainer settled the conflict the group 2 review escalated: a detector
configuration has no skills set. The skill router belongs to the tool's earlier
shape, and a family's prompt, checklist, tools and counterexamples already carry
what a round evolves.
The README described the project as an editor-agent harness whose skills steer
it, and pointed users at the maintainer's spec directory. The tool is a CLI now
and the agent integrations are optional, so the opening says that, the skills
section describes what it actually is, and the spec pointer is gone from the
user-facing text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
The maintainer settled both items the group 1 review escalated.
The family that covers server-side request forgery is named untrusted
destination and also covers open redirect, because both are untrusted input
choosing where a request goes and the corpus carries 34 open-redirect rows that
would otherwise be unclassifiable. The requirement, the brief and the design
example now say so, and the approval note records the amendment.
The shipped taxonomy is flat, so no answer can earn hierarchical partial credit.
Rather than leave that as prose, two new acceptance criteria require every
agreement figure and every family figure to say it, and both report types now
carry the flag, computed from the taxonomy rather than asserted. A taxonomy that
later declares a parent flips it without any other change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Task 2.4. Per family, and per slice when asked: outcome counts, recall, silence,
Youden, a directional-bias index and recall at a fixed false-positive ceiling.
Rows that cannot be scored are listed by reason and leave every denominator, and
a family with nothing scorable reports no rate rather than a perfect one.
Two numbers exist because Youden cannot tell apart a detector that flags
everything from one that says everything is safe: the directional-bias index
separates them, and recall at a fixed ceiling is forfeited entirely once a
family leaks more than the budget allows.
Change against a baseline is not a difference of means. Flips are counted per
pair in both directions and a two-sided exact sign test decides whether the
change is bigger than the noise, so one flip in ten reads as noise and six reads
as a real regression.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Foundation: taxonomy, DeepSeek endpoint, corpus fields, TypeScript grammar,
curated hunter tools. Core: classifier tiers and measurement, per-pair family
scoring and aggregation, detector configurations and runner, verifier registry
with oracle callback, canary templates and second judge, journal and archive.
Integration: one teacher rule, family scoring on the pairs hunter path, round
zero with per-model noise floors, scan-path tags and manifest block, proposers,
acceptance and revert, round orchestration, publish, subcommands. Corpus
repairs and validation last. Both sanity reviews' findings recorded in the
plan; K-run evaluation honors requirement 3.5 at every stage.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
A learning package layered families -> classify -> scoring -> split ->
detectors and verifiers -> rounds -> publish, composing the existing seams:
the tool hunter gains prompt, context and tool parameters; the hunter path of
the pair scorer takes an injected family matcher so pairs never imports
learning; every learning path selects teachers through one train-only rule;
the regress verdict takes an optional canary oracle; the chat endpoint resolves
DeepSeek before OpenRouter with thinking disabled and reasoning replayed, while
embeddings keep their own endpoint; HarnessX proposes behind the seam with a
scripted proposer for offline runs. Fifty-nine acceptance criteria traced;
boundary sections, file structure plan and migration phases populated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Scope: catch the ten taxonomy families reliably on real-world and generated
application code, including forgotten authorization checks; not browser
engines, interpreters or memory-safety fuzzing. Decisions: verifier-aligned
families, a measured per-family noise floor as the regression budget, a cheap
model on an independent chat endpoint with embeddings elsewhere, canary-oracle
verifiers for the four most dangerous families first, the obligations lever
folded into the access-control family's first round, web families before the
C slice. Eleven requirements in EARS form; awaiting approval.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
AIxCC cyber reasoning systems, self-improving harness methods (GEPA, DGM,
Self-Harness, SkillOpt, AHE), vulnerability-dataset pitfalls and CWE taxonomies,
and routing/regression-control literature. The design changes they force:
coarse verifier-aligned families instead of fine CWE, multi-label routing with
an unknown class, pair-wise outcomes with a directional-bias index, K-run
reliable-change tests, a per-class seed-noise floor as the regression budget,
a no-regression acceptance rule with ties rejected, structural edits over prose
edits, a proposer blind to the holdout, and verifier code and gold labels
outside every editable surface.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Measured 2026-09-06 on the vibe-py holdout: the existing tool hunter, with no
learning, scores 12/14 pair-correct (Youden +0.857, no leaks) once detection
and silence are keyed on the labeled class and function and the byte-identical
twins are excluded; the overlay scores 5/14 on the same rows. The published
hunter number (0/17, Youden -0.588) was a scoring artifact: the scorer wanted
the literal CWE id in the finding text and the prompt never asked for it.
The brief proposes an auto-classifier as the routing key, one evolved hunter
configuration per class, a class-aware scorer with unscorable denominators,
the split enforced by construction, and the HarnessX evolve loop with per-class
attribution as the round primitive. Raw measurements are committed under
reports/measurements.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Six task groups in the design's migration order: closed facts and
obligation shapes; operations, siblings, declared policy, dominance
protocol and the checker; MAP wiring, reports, ranking and hunter intent;
corpus harvest mode, labels, leave-one-out and relabeling; the
obligations lever; validation. All 44 acceptance criteria covered; no
task waits on the unimplemented upstream specs (path-aware evaluation
enters through the Dominance protocol and an optional PathRecord input).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Requirements approved by the maintainer in session. Design: closed
obligation facts (operations and dischargers), obligation shapes as a
second family in the mechanism store, sibling-set consistency and an
optional declared policy as the policy sources, a Dominance protocol
with an order-based default so the checker works function-local before
reachability and guard dominance land, findings at suspicion carrying
consistency_violation / declared_policy_violation / function_local as
data, reports, manifest and ranking fields, handler_context harvest
mode, leave-one-out per obligation kind, and an obligations lever with
pending policy clauses under the existing gate. All 44 acceptance
criteria traced.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Absence bugs as obligations rather than flows: obligated operations and
discharger kinds as closed facts, obligation shapes learned from trusted
pairs, the application's policy recovered from sibling-handler
consistency and an optional declared policy file, path-aware evaluation
with a function-local degraded mode, honest rungs below proof, an
`obligations` improve lever under the holdout gate. Depends on
reachability-flow-model and guard-dominance-regime; the roadmap marks
reachability as the critical path for two consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
- tasks.md: all tasks checked; rounds 1-6 recorded with RED evidence,
measured leave-one-out and admission numbers, and the recorded design
deviations.
- spec.json: completed 2026-09-05.
- roadmap: corpus-seeded-mechanisms marked completed; the loop is closed
end to end (export -> improve admits under the holdout clause -> scan
searches -> reports name the mechanism).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Review rounds 3-5 remediations (Req 5, 7).
- ousast improve resolves candidates from the target's calibration dir,
then the working directory's (where `mechanisms export` writes), and
admits into <target>/.openultrasast/calibration/mechanisms.jsonl,
where a scan of that target reads; --mechanism-candidates,
--mechanism-store, --no-mechanisms; --dry-run redirects the store to
scratch; accepted rounds print admit/retract <id>.
- run_improvement threads the store paths; RoundOutcome carries the
mechanism edits; reverted mechanism keys are blocked outright; a
no-gain admission is rejected as mechanism_no_gain; a retraction may
name an admitted record that left the candidate set.
- leave-one-out forwards variant-search degradations and pins the
containment and label rules; mechanisms export defaults to the
candidates file so it never re-admits a tombstone.
- design §Lever rewritten to the implemented gate; README and docs show
export -> improve -> scan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Task 4.2 (Req 5.3, 5.4, 5.5).
- propose_mechanism_edits: retract admitted records that leak on a
holdout fixed side; admit a candidate only when a trial store holding
it alone recovers a currently missed holdout pair without leaking.
- run_round(mechanism_candidates=, mechanism_store=): validates, applies
after the rule gate passed, re-scores the holdout pairs per profile with
variant search (evaluate_mechanism_profiles), and rejects with a
byte-for-byte revert on mechanism_leak, profile_regression or
mechanism_no_gain; the journal records each mechanism edit with its
pair provenance and the metrics before and after.
- The rule gate and its per-profile clause are unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
- variant_search.search_tree skips a malformed store row with a
variants_store_row_invalid degradation instead of aborting the scan;
a hit on a demoted or flowless overlay record is never merged (test).
- seed.pair_lessons is the one shape derivation shared by the exporter
and leave-one-out; labels pass line and sink together; pairs without a
labeled function are reported as no_labeled_function.
- config parses [variants].max_mechanisms with the shared int helper.
- regress.candidate.hotspot_from_finding is the one zero-score hotspot
helper for forced inventory and variant findings.
- design synced (SearchResult, hits_to_findings summaries, candidate.py).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Task 2.3 (Req 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 6.2).
- [variants] enabled / max_mechanisms config; MAP runs variant search
after the overlay in standard and deep scans only, appends the variant
findings, rewrites overlay.json with merged ids, and the manifest
records mechanisms_searched, files_searched, findings and
merged_into_overlay.
- REGRESS: variant findings join the candidate list after the promotions
as zero-score hotspots, under the existing safety check and cap.
- Spec notes for group 2 and the design synced (variant_search.py,
seed.py, derive_shape signature).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Task 1.1 (Req 2.1-2.4). Spec approved by the maintainer in session.
- semantic/variants.py: Shape (language, sink trailing name, arity,
source positions and kinds, closed guard kind, mechanism id) with a
stable text-free key; derive_shape finds the labeled sink call site in
the vulnerable FileIR, traces argument identifiers through binds to a
fact source, a parameter or a container read, and classifies the guard
the fixed side added from the labeled function's added statements
against a closed set (none when unknown). No path, line or literal
enters a shape; a constant-only call teaches nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
- tasks.md: round-12 verdict and the decision to assemble the redaction
test's example key at runtime and rewrite the unpushed series so no
commit carries a contiguous key literal; two dated notes marked as
superseded by tasks 8.1 and 8.4.
- roadmap: the folded inventory-vs-overlay Youden item is checked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
- tasks.md: all tasks checked; the two escalations are closed (5.1 by the
Req 10 pointer rows, 5.3 by the Req 9 review tiers); round 11 recorded
with the carry-forwards for corpus-seeded-mechanisms and
overlay-ir-completeness.
- roadmap: measured state after tiers and pointer slices (vibe-py 115,
agent-vfc 59, gates byte-identical to pre-spec); pair-corpus-honesty
marked completed.
- spec.json: completed 2026-09-05 after eleven review rounds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Task 8.4 (Req 10.6, 5.1).
- harvest.merge_recipes appends recipes by name and never rewrites
existing rows.
- vibe-py/build_recipes.py --pointers: the 40 LLM-generated repositories
without a license become vendored = false rows (80 pairs, agent,
seeded) appended to recipes.toml; unlicensed human repos stay skipped.
- agent-vfc/build_recipes.py --from ... --pointers [--cache]: unlicensed
agent-authored fixes become title-tier pointer rows whose function
label is derived from the cached excerpt (30 added from a fresh
662-candidate search); TOML booleans rendered correctly.
- catalogs regenerated: vibe-py 115 rows (35 vendored + 80 pointer),
agent-vfc 59 (29 + 30); no excerpt is vendored for any pointer row.
- `pairs --slice vibe-py --pointers` scores both provenances (human 35,
agent 80); the default run skips 80 pairs with pointer_pair_skipped;
suite and gates unchanged. README/docs name the nightly command.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Task 8.3 (Req 10.1-10.5).
- pairs.py: catalog rows with vendored = false carry their harvest recipe
and no excerpts; evaluate_catalog harvests them into
OPENULTRASAST_PAIR_CACHE (default ~/.cache/openultrasast/pairs) only
when `pairs --pointers` or OPENULTRASAST_PAIRS_NETWORK=1 allows the
network, otherwise records pointer_pair_skipped (a failed fetch is
pointer_pair_fetch_failed with detail); a warm cache never scores
without the switch. select_vendored for tests and gates.
- harvest.py: materialize_pointer harvests into the cache without the
license requirement (nothing is redistributed); redaction applies.
- catalog_gen.py: emits pointer rows with recipe fields; training
manifests skip them.
- pair_gate and improve/evolve.evaluate_profiles score vendored pairs
only; cli `pairs --pointers`; .gitignore covers the cache path.
- tests: loader, skip/degradation, cache hit, fetch failure, warm cache
with network off, profile gate exclusion, harvest and generator paths;
conftest keeps every test offline whatever the shell exports.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Two engine specs drafted after the pair-corpus baseline, awaiting owner
approval before implementation:
- corpus-seeded-mechanisms: structural shapes derived from trusted pairs,
export, variant search merged with overlay flows, leave-one-out
measurement, and a closed `mechanisms` lever for the improve loop.
- reachability-flow-model: call graph over FunctionIR, reachability from
entry points to sinks, hunter client preferring HarnessX (task 4.1b).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
Harvest 176 isolated vuln-vs-fix functions (109 CVEs, 352 training rows)
into benchmarks/pairs/vfc with provenance and a JSONL training manifest.
Score the slice as an honesty dashboard (ousast pairs --slice vfc);
keep the pair gate on the local fixtures only.
Add openultrasast[semantic] with official grammar wheels and one CST walker
into FileIR. quick stays extra-free. Host CLI is not overlay-ready. Default CI
stays extra-free; a semantic job runs pytest -m semantic.
Regex inventory stays the proposer. MAP attaches promote/demote/unadjudicated/coverage
from intra-file taint (tree-sitter when a grammar parses, Python ast as last resort).
Deep sandboxes promotions only, ordered by the existing heuristic ranker plus optional
OpenRouter mechanism recall. The SAST pair slice scores overlay outcomes; the stage-1
detection gate and local pair gate stay inventory-only.
