Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5.5 7b17eacd44 bench(learn): injection first slice -- compiled AI classifier, out-of-repo evaluation (decision-engine 6.2, 6.6)
6.2: the 724 static examples' 616 distinct excerpts embedded with openai/text-embedding-3-small via
OpenRouter, 198,819 tokens, $0.0040 metered (ceiling $1).

6.6, family injection only, memory = every family (at most 2 contrast examples per prompt), input
profile v1: smoke fixed k = 5 (repeat prefix-cache hit share 0.96); one compile (program c1237a49,
proposed instruction 5, balanced Brier 0.128 on 13 C_val candidates vs 0.199 baseline); outer grouped
5-fold, 110 out-of-repository candidates in 29 groups: ADVISORY recall 0.90 [0.82, 0.97], precision
0.54 [0.44, 0.65], AUC 0.74; BLOCK not offered (ECE 0.064 > 0.05; no fold reached a Wilson lower bound
of 0.95); canary re-ask agreement 0.83. $0.91 metered at list price; DeepSeek balance $18.20 -> $17.90.

Instrument fixes found on the way, each with a test:
- memory build: pair sides join the record stored under their harvest unit pin (--units), and only the
  built profile's records are read (static and plane shared a key; 85 -> 724 examples);
- retrieval: stage 1 per side (family / contrast) and at most 2 contrast examples, never padded;
- program: the JSON answer contract is part of the signature, appended to proposed instructions
  (DeepSeek JSON mode refused a prompt without "json");
- compile: candidate_families for a one-family compile; compile.toml k = 5 from the smoke rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-10-01 20:40:41 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5.5 9e3c83cfdc fix(learn): withhold label-tracking signals from the v1 classifier; leak audit
Maintainer decision "Neutralise both for v1".

1. Phantom candidates. A pair side's candidates are now only the functions that
   side declares (plane/harvest.py `declares`, the excerpt builder's
   function_bounds); a labelled function absent from a side is listed under
   `absent_on_side` and never asked, and a side declaring none of its verify
   family's functions is no verify unit. The recorded harvest units held 58
   phantom verify candidates (53 fixed, 5 vulnerable sides). build_features.py
   skips label rows whose side does not declare the function and drops their
   earlier rows (MemoryStore.drop_rows); rebuilt the pair records from the
   recorded signals, no model call: 126 label rows absent_on_side (117 fixed,
   9 vulnerable) -- access_control 13, config_secrets 4, deserialization 20,
   injection 28, memory 4, output_encoding 16, path 15, untrusted_destination
   26 -- so 252 feature rows dropped (1712 -> 1460); no other row changed.

2. Engine withheld. Input profiles in learn/schema.py (`v1` withholds the
   engine instrument, `full` withholds nothing); ProgramSpec.inputs defaults to
   v1 and compile.toml records it. Neither the engine's state nor its values
   reach the candidate, examples, demonstrations or the instruction proposer's
   error summary, and the Gower retrieval distance leaves the engine block out.
   Stored records are unchanged. design.md Risks records the decision and that
   the engine returns only through a pre-registered A/B on assumed-benign and
   benign-control negatives.

3. `ousast learn audit-leaks` (learn/leaks.py): per feature and per instrument
   state, separation = (pairs the signal alone puts on the right side - on the
   wrong side) / pairs, over all pairs and per family; flagged at >= 0.20 over
   >= 10 pairs. Counts under
   benchmarks/measurements/2026-10-01-decision-engine-leak-audit/ (before and
   after the rebuild). After: facts.function_lines (0.80 untrusted_destination,
   0.75 config_secrets, 0.26 injection; higher on fixed), verify.turns_mean
   0.67 config_secrets, eng.* 0.35-0.40 output_encoding, verify.flag_a/votes/
   site_offset and agree.final 0.20-0.30 on 10-12 pair families. Before the
   rebuild the phantom fixed sides drove state.source/state.roles/ms.flagged
   to 1.0 and state.engine to 0.95 on deserialization.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-10-01 19:40:58 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5.5 0f9318f58b spec(learned-decision-engine): revised design approved; permissive-only demonstrations
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-10-01 09:23:35 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5.5 b6a49fa4dc spec(learned-decision-engine): design and tasks revised for the AI classifier
In-house DSPy-style program (retrieve -> classify(k)) on the metered client;
example store with signal-profile Gower neighbours re-ranked by code embeddings;
balanced Brier metric, bootstrap few-shot and instruction search on a compile
split; Platt calibration on other folds; cached replay; tasks 6.1-6.7 with paid
steps flagged for go-ahead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-10-01 09:22:29 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5.5 d7a572498d spec(learned-decision-engine): design approved; implementation plan for review
Assumed-benign pushes mined from non-security commits as a separate label source
(maintainer decision). Ten tasks in the design's commit order; the harvest,
exp-001 and the v3 check wait for budget go-ahead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-09-30 18:14:31 +02:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5.5 f6f9591cd0 spec(learned-decision-engine): design for review
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-09-30 18:13:27 +02:00