[
 {
  "decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
  "degradations": [],
  "disposition": "accepted",
  "finding_id": "python-os-command:app.py:17",
  "model_ids": [],
  "panels": [
   {
    "confidence": 0.75,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
    "leaning": "vulnerability",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=critical, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_a",
    "vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
   },
   {
    "confidence": 0.6,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
    "leaning": "false_positive",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_b",
    "vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
   }
  ],
  "triggered": true,
  "triggers": [
   "gates_risky_fix",
   "severity:critical"
  ],
  "votes": {
   "accepted": 2
  },
  "warnings": []
 },
 {
  "decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
  "degradations": [],
  "disposition": "accepted",
  "finding_id": "python-shell-true:app.py:23",
  "model_ids": [],
  "panels": [
   {
    "confidence": 0.75,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
    "leaning": "vulnerability",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=critical, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_a",
    "vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
   },
   {
    "confidence": 0.6,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
    "leaning": "false_positive",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_b",
    "vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
   }
  ],
  "triggered": true,
  "triggers": [
   "gates_risky_fix",
   "severity:critical"
  ],
  "votes": {
   "accepted": 2
  },
  "warnings": []
 },
 {
  "decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
  "degradations": [],
  "disposition": "accepted",
  "finding_id": "python-sql-injection:app.py:44",
  "model_ids": [],
  "panels": [
   {
    "confidence": 0.75,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
    "leaning": "vulnerability",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=high, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_a",
    "vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
   },
   {
    "confidence": 0.6,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
    "leaning": "false_positive",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_b",
    "vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
   }
  ],
  "triggered": true,
  "triggers": [
   "gates_risky_fix",
   "severity:high"
  ],
  "votes": {
   "accepted": 2
  },
  "warnings": []
 },
 {
  "decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
  "degradations": [],
  "disposition": "accepted",
  "finding_id": "python-sql-injection:app.py:50",
  "model_ids": [],
  "panels": [
   {
    "confidence": 0.75,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
    "leaning": "vulnerability",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=high, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_a",
    "vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
   },
   {
    "confidence": 0.6,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
    "leaning": "false_positive",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_b",
    "vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
   }
  ],
  "triggered": true,
  "triggers": [
   "gates_risky_fix",
   "severity:high"
  ],
  "votes": {
   "accepted": 2
  },
  "warnings": []
 },
 {
  "decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
  "degradations": [],
  "disposition": "accepted",
  "finding_id": "python-unsafe-eval:app.py:28",
  "model_ids": [],
  "panels": [
   {
    "confidence": 0.75,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
    "leaning": "vulnerability",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=critical, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_a",
    "vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
   },
   {
    "confidence": 0.6,
    "disposition": "accepted",
    "false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
    "leaning": "false_positive",
    "model_id": null,
    "rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
    "role": "panel_b",
    "vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
   }
  ],
  "triggered": true,
  "triggers": [
   "gates_risky_fix",
   "severity:critical"
  ],
  "votes": {
   "accepted": 2
  },
  "warnings": []
 }
]