# Implementation Plan Order follows the design's commit sequence. Every task is a commit gated on the full suite's own exit code, `ruff check`, `ruff format --check` and `mypy`. No reported number changes until task 9 adopts a compiled program; without an adopted program every path is today's. Requirement 3 changed on 2026-10-01 (an AI classifier with local memory, compiled DSPy-style in-house); tasks 1-5 are unaffected, tasks 6-10 are re-planned for it. Sub-tasks marked **(budget go-ahead)** spend model money or host hours: each starts only after the maintainer confirms its budget against the provider balance read just before it, and none starts with a ceiling above that balance. No test makes a model or embedding call. - [x] 1. Schema and features - `learn/schema.py` (closed, typed allow-list; no identities; missing != zero), `learn/features.py` (host builder), new memory `KINDS`, `plane/tasks/features.py` and the `remember` input; tests enforcing the allow-list and the exclusion of label-carrying fields. - _Requirements: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 7.2_ - [x] 2. Framework tags - `ruleset/frameworks.toml`; tag and split every framework/library entry listed in design section 2; `priors=` in the semantic and quick loaders (default `all`, so today's scan is unchanged -- the golden benchmark test stays byte-identical); a lint test that no untagged framework entry remains. - _Requirements: 8.2, 8.4_ - [x] 3. Role inference - `learn/roles.py` (deterministic wrapper inference), `plane/tasks/roles.py` (model roles, the `model_sinks.py` approach), the vocabulary overlay for the engine; fixture tests with no model calls. - _Requirements: 8.1_ - [x] 4. Labels - `learn/sources.toml` (fail-closed allowed sources, v3 excluded unread), `learn/labels.py`, `ousast learn labels`, repository-group normalisation and CVE merge, the `assumed_benign` source mined from non-security commits (separate, never merged); a first label snapshot committed as counts only. - _Requirements: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 7.1_ - [x] 5. Harvest (needs budget go-ahead) - A plane Run of verify a/b on the verify-family pairs and development cases (~$6, ceiling $10), model roles on the candidate files (ceiling $10), engine features for the pair corpus on the host (frozen source, one container at a time, background). - Done 2026-10-01 (`benchmarks/measurements/2026-10-01-decision-engine-harvest/record.json`): verify $2.54 and roles $1.40 by attribution. The engine job finished the same day (682 of 686 pair sides; the 2 family-unknown pairs not run) and the feature records were rebuilt; dev-php pins have no engine run (`missing`). - Advisory-fix pairs harvested 2026-10-02 (`benchmarks/measurements/2026-10-02-decision-engine-harvest-advisory/record.json`): 194 sides, verify a/b on the 34 untrusted_destination sides and model roles on all ($0.38 metered, ceiling $5), engine on the host (54 ran, 58 asked no question, 82 no language model); static memory 724 -> 904 examples. The leak audit flags nothing new in the static profile; the plane profile newly flags `verify.flag_b` and `ms.operation`. - _Requirements: 1.1_ - [ ] 6. Program, local memory and compilation (design sections 4-5) - [x] 6.1 Excerpts and the example store (no model) - `learn/excerpt.py` (function span at the label's pin, bounds 80/4,000 for candidates and 40/2,000 for examples, numbered lines, no path/repository/commit, advisory ids and security wording in comments redacted, delta diff); `learn/examples.py` and `ousast learn memory build` (label + feature record + excerpt -> `example` row; refuses `origin: user` and sources outside `sources.toml`; exits 2 when more than 10% of a source has no excerpt); `example` added to `KINDS`; `put_blob`/`get_blob` on both backends. - Tests: `test_learn_excerpt.py`, example-builder refusals, blob round trip on FileStore (S3 gated). - _Requirements: 3.2, 3.6, 7.2_ - [x] 6.2 Metered embeddings and the cache - `plane/models/openrouter-embedding.yaml` (`input_per_m: 0.02`), `MeteredEmbeddingClient` in `plane/budget.py`, usage kept by `parse_embedding_response`; cache `embeddings//.json`; `ousast learn memory embed`; scripted-client tests. - **(budget go-ahead)** embedding the store: ~5.0 M tokens, ~$0.10, ceiling $1 (OpenRouter account). Done 2026-10-01: 616 distinct excerpts of the 724 static examples, 198,819 tokens, 20 calls, $0.0040 metered (`benchmarks/measurements/2026-10-01-decision-engine-injection-slice/record.json`). - _Requirements: 3.2_ - [x] 6.3 Retrieval and the evaluation boundary (no model) - `learn/retrieve.py`: per-instrument Gower distance with explicit missing, `n1 = 40`, embedding re-rank `r = lam(1 - D) + (1 - lam)cos`, `signals_only` mode, balance rule (`k_ret = 6`), `eligible(example, target, fold)`, near-duplicate drop in evaluation, deployment self-exclusion. - `learn/folds.py`: compile split (25% of groups), outer grouped 5-fold, leave-one-source-out, leave-one-framework-out. - Tests: `test_learn_retrieve.py` including `test_boundary` (every rendered example and demonstration eligible, for all fold kinds; `memory.seed` excludes the case's group), `test_learn_folds.py`. - _Requirements: 3.2, 3.4, 7.1, 8.3_ - [x] 6.4 The program (no model in tests) - `learn/program.py`: the signature, prompt rendering (instruction + demonstrations as a byte-identical prefix, then retrieved examples, then the candidate), JSON parsing with one retry -> `unsure, parse_failed`, `Classify(k)` with temperature 0 then 0.7, the score `s` and majority verdict; `responses/.json` cache and replay; `temperature`/`logprobs` pass-through in `MeteredClient.complete` and `DeepSeekChatClient._call`. - Tests: `test_learn_program.py` (no `EXCLUDED_FIELDS` in prompts, prefix identity, parsing, `unsure` cannot BLOCK, budget ceiling, replay). - _Requirements: 3.1, 3.3_ - [x] 6.5 Compile, calibrate, evaluate (no model in tests) - `learn/compile.toml` (pre-registered metric: balanced Brier score; seeds; budget), `learn/compile.py` (bootstrap few-shot on `C_boot`, 6 proposed + baseline instructions scored on `C_val`, 4 demonstration sets, alternates for leave-one-framework-out, artifact `programs/.json`), `learn/calibrate.py` (cross-fitted Platt, reliability/slope/intercept/ECE, ADVISORY-only downgrade), `learn/evaluate.py` (operating points from the other folds, repository-cluster bootstrap, strata, "insufficient data"), `ousast learn compile|evaluate|curve`. - Tests: `test_learn_compile.py` (`test_reproducible_from_cache` on both backends), `test_learn_calibrate.py`, `test_learn_decide.py`. - _Requirements: 3.3, 3.5, 5.2, 7.3, 7.4_ - [x] 6.6 First paid slice **(budget go-ahead: ~$5 expected, ceiling $7)** - Smoke run on 20 candidates (~$0.10): real token counts, prefix-cache hit share, parse rate; it fixes `k` (5 if samples 2..k hit the cache for >= 80% of their prompt tokens, else 1) before anything else is spent. - One compile per profile with data (`static` first; ~$2.2, ceiling $3). - Outer-fold evaluation, priors off, evaluable families only (675 candidates: ~$2.0 at k = 1, ~$3.0 at k = 5), with the 30-candidate canary set; report under `benchmarks/measurements/-decision-engine-v1/` (counts and intervals only, no identities). - Done 2026-10-01 for family **injection only** (the maintainer's scope for this slice; memory holds every family, at most 2 contrast examples per prompt): smoke fixed `k = 5` (repeat hit share 0.96); program `c1237a49...` (proposed instruction 5, balanced Brier 0.128 on 13 `C_val` candidates vs 0.199 baseline); 110 out-of-repository candidates in 29 groups: ADVISORY recall 0.90 [0.82, 0.97], precision 0.54 [0.44, 0.65]; AUC of `s` 0.74 [0.65, 0.85]; BLOCK not offered (ECE 0.064 > 0.05, and no fold reached a Wilson lower bound of 0.95); canary agreement 0.83; $0.91 metered at list price (provider balance $18.20 -> $17.90). Record: `benchmarks/measurements/2026-10-01-decision-engine-injection-slice/record.json`. The other evaluable families are not evaluated yet. - _Requirements: 3.1-3.5, 5.2, 7.3, 7.4_ - [ ] 6.7 Second paid slice **(budget go-ahead: ~$7 expected, ceiling $10; needs a top-up)** - Leave-one-source-out (~$1.4-2.1), leave-one-framework-out where a framework reaches 10 groups ($0 today), learning curves over memory size (0/25/50/100%) and number of sources (~$5.2), recorded beside 6.6. - Partial 2026-10-02 (`benchmarks/measurements/2026-10-02-decision-engine-slice-2/record.json`): after the advisory-fix harvest (memory 724 -> 904), one compile per evaluable family and its outer-fold evaluation for all six (injection, untrusted_destination, path, output_encoding, deserialization, access_control); out-of-repository AUC 0.77-0.96, BLOCK offered for none (calibration holds only for output_encoding, where no fold reaches the Wilson bound); one memory-size point for injection (724 vs 904 examples, paired: AUC 0.76 vs 0.77). $2.88 metered (ceiling $8). Not done: leave-one-source-out, the 0/25/50% curve points, the source-count curve. - _Requirements: 5.1, 5.2, 8.3_ - [ ] 7. Experiments (exp-001 and program variants need budget go-ahead) - [x] 7.1 Machinery (no model in tests): `learn/experiments.py` -- YAML manifests under `plane/experiments/.yaml` (hypothesis, arms as program-spec overrides or plane `task_env`, unit, pairing, repository cluster, metrics with `[label=]` selectors and targets, MDE, two looks with O'Brien-Fleming boundaries, budget ceiling, families, folds, frozen units file), `register` (`experiment` row with both digests; refuses an uncommitted, modified or re-declared manifest), `units` (freeze the families' evaluation candidates, paired by candidate across pins; no model), `run` (paired arms in a seeded repository order, a seeded coin per unit for which arm goes first, `arm_outcome` rows, resumable, arm A replay-only at $0, canary replicates under a fresh cache salt, the first look during the run), `analyse` (paired repository bootstrap, exact McNemar, the looks, adopt / reject / equivalent / inconclusive, `experiment_result` row + `benchmarks/experiments//result.json`), `ousast learn experiment register|units|run|analyse`; `OUSAST_VERIFY_CALLERS=off` in `plane/tasks/verify.py`; the retrieval-ensemble sampling variant (`ProgramSpec.sampling = retrieval_ensemble`: `k` samples at temperature 0 over `k` disjoint retrieved example sets; default unchanged). Tests: `test_learn_experiments.py` (18, scripted clients, FileStore). - [x] 7.2 Registered, not run: `exp-001-known-callers` (plane arms, `flag_rate[label=1]`, MDE 0.15, ceiling $15; units `pending` -- model-free candidate generation on the 41 development repositories is not built, and plane Run annotation checks / the `experiment-outcome` task are not written) and `exp-002-retrieval-ensemble` (arm A today's k = 5 temperature sampling, arm B the retrieval ensemble; primary canary agreement (target 0.90) and within-pair AUC, secondary usd per candidate, AUC, ADVISORY recall/precision; families injection and access_control on the slice-2 candidates; ceiling $4: A $1, B $3). - [ ] 7.3 exp-001 run and recorded (~$7.7 expected, ceiling $15) -- an inconclusive result is pre-registered as likely; needs the frozen units file first. - [ ] 7.4 exp-002 run and recorded **(budget go-ahead: ~$2 expected, ceiling $4)**; further program variants (`k = 5` vs `k = 1`, the confidence source) as new manifests. - _Requirements: 3.6, 4.1-4.4_ - [ ] 8. Integration - `plane/tasks/embed.py` (Model `openrouter-embedding`) and `plane/tasks/decide.py` (Model `deepseek-flash`, metered, exits 0/2/3), the host seed of the adopted program and the case's boundary-filtered memory; the `scan` decision stage and `dropped_by_engine.json`; `pre-push` admission with the engine (structural admission reasons unchanged; concurrency, `undecided: deadline`, a per-push budget); report fields (p, operating point, program id, verdict, rationale, cited lines); the fallback line (no program, no key, budget exhausted, insufficient data, calibration failed); the opt-in adaptation layer with user-local memory. - Tests use scripted clients; a plane fixture Run proves `decide` never receives an example of its own case. - _Requirements: 6.1-6.3, 7.3, 7.5_ - [ ] 9. Adopt - `ousast learn adopt`; the packaged `ruleset/decision/program-.json` with only licence-cleared demonstrations (the maintainer decides which licences qualify), re-evaluated as its own variant; the canary drift check before adoption; the priors-on/off experiment per framework with a recorded decision **(budget go-ahead per experiment, ~$1-2 each)**. - _Requirements: 3.3, 8.2_ - [ ] 10. The one-time v3 check **(budget go-ahead for the engine's v3 spend, ~$0.0045 per candidate)** - Commit `prediction-v3.json` first (program id, memory snapshot digest, model ids, operating points, predicted intervals, spend ceiling from the owner's candidate count); then v3 is run under protocol v3 and `result-v3-engine.json` is committed. Nothing between the two commits may touch the program, memory snapshot, features, priors or thresholds. This spec's code never opens v3 files. - _Requirements: 5.3_