mirror of
https://github.com/norandom/OpenUltraSAST.git
synced 2026-10-16 03:49:26 +00:00
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5
102a21fc4e
The census measured this family completing 35 questions on NodeGoat with no obligation raised anywhere: every modelled data operation lives in app/data/*-dao.js, none in a route handler file, and operations were scoped to the region's own file. The family had nothing to be right or wrong about. The obligation now follows the one named call the handler writes, out of the region's file and no further. How it is followed is the point. jssrc2cpg does not resolve allocationsDAO.getByUserIdAndThreshold(...) to the DAO body: the callee is an external stub with no code. That stub's fullName records where the member was written, so the implementation is reached by the graph's own provenance rather than by a repository-wide name guess, which is the false positive the file scope was closed against. A control asserts it: a third module defining a member of the same name that nothing imports is not attributed. A row is attributed to the region's DECLARED function, which is what lets a question about displayAllocations match a graph that holds a <lambda>. A carried row is also checked for a guard at the CALL, because that is where a handler establishes who is asking. The method holding a carried operation joins the question's context scope, so the module holding the query cannot change under a claim that depends on it without the change being attributed. The witness names both sites and the finding is located at the call, which is the line a contributor changed. A carried obligation corroborates, it does not entail, and that was measured rather than assumed. Entailing it reported handleSignup, which looks a user up by name to check the name is free during registration and is public by design, because two authenticated siblings in the same file pass req.session.userId into the same module. The entailed rung's justification is that one FILE contradicts itself, same file and same trust context; carried, the compared operations live in a data-access module that handlers of different trust contexts share. The corroborated band already asks the right residual: does this operation require a check, or is the route legitimately public? Measured on NodeGoat: 15 handlers asked, obligations raised at zero before and six now, three reaching a verdict, all corroborated, none reported without a judge. VAmPI unchanged at two entailed findings, because it keeps handler and query in one file and carries nothing. What this does not reach is recorded, not implied. NodeGoat's documented insecure direct object reference still raises nothing, because its module reads with allocationsCol.find(...) and find is not a modelled operation: Array.prototype.find and jQuery's .find are everywhere, so it needs an argument-shape discriminator and its own measurement (task 14.8). Two of the three corroborated claims are correct code whose identity read a destructuring spelled away, and the cross-file contradiction that would entail the real defect needs a sibling-scope decision (task 14.7). 1,415 tests pass, fifteen skipped; eleven Joern-gated query tests pass in the image. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo