Files
Open_Ultra_SAST/benchmarks/pairs/agent-vfc/supplieradvisor-mvp-route-387bcf/fixed.ts
T
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 c2d9c4ad01 feat(learning-harness): absence rows travel with their registration
Eight of the ten vendored access-control rows had no named handler at all,
so every one of them would have scored `missing_context` forever rather
than as a detector miss. After the re-harvest nine are named and the tenth
states its reason.

The handler-context mode now carries the class its framework registers,
multi-line decorators, and commented-out guards -- `#@token_required`
above a ThreatByte handler is the entire bug. Where the registration lives
in another document (connexion's `operationId`, an express router), a
recipe names `context = [...]`, the harvester writes that stanza per side,
and the pair materializes both files at their repository-relative paths so
the entry-point mapper sees the layout the project has. `harvest_recipe`
fetches every blob before the first write and the driver takes `--report`,
so a failed fetch leaves a reviewed excerpt exactly as it was.

Two defects the re-harvest exposed: `.mjs` was not a known suffix, so the
one pair vendored as an ES module had no file target at all; and
`_python_route_access` matched auth words inside decorator prose, reading
`@ns.doc(description='... without proper authorization checks')` as a
guard. Recorded in the hygiene artifact: nine of the ten duplicate groups
sit on both sides of the split, which the repository-level split cannot
see.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-06 12:39:55 +02:00

71 lines
2.4 KiB
TypeScript

// Provenance: bigfivefoods/supplieradvisor-mvp PATCH (fixed).
// repo: bigfivefoods/supplieradvisor-mvp
// commit: 387bcf40e984a2ee1832ab7beabf0284c5b627d8
// parent: a7a9bc260d649ea2e582c07435bfd7d93100647b
// commit_url: https://github.com/bigfivefoods/supplieradvisor-mvp/commit/387bcf40e984a2ee1832ab7beabf0284c5b627d8
// cve:
// license: MIT
// function: PATCH
// relpath: app/api/customers/claims/route.ts
// provenance: agent
// mechanism: identity_from_request_body
// upstream_start: 90
export async function PATCH(request: NextRequest) {
try {
const body = await request.json();
const claimId = Number(body.id);
const companyId = Number(body.companyId);
if (!Number.isFinite(claimId) || claimId <= 0) {
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'id required' }, { status: 400 });
}
if (!Number.isFinite(companyId) || companyId <= 0) {
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'companyId required' }, { status: 400 });
}
const _gate = await requireCompanyAccess(request, companyId, { legacyPrivyUserId: legacyPrivyFrom(request) });
if (!_gate.ok) return _gate.response;
const supabase = getSupabaseServer();
const { data: existing, error: fetchError } = await supabase
.from('customer_claims')
.select('*')
.eq('id', claimId)
.eq('profile_id', companyId)
.single();
if (fetchError || !existing) {
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Claim not found' }, { status: 404 });
}
const fields = [
'status',
'priority',
'title',
'description',
'amount_claimed',
'amount_approved',
'resolution_notes',
'owner_name',
'claim_type',
] as const;
const updates: Record<string, unknown> = { updated_at: new Date().toISOString() };
for (const f of fields) {
if (body[f] !== undefined) updates[f] = body[f];
}
if (['resolved', 'closed', 'approved', 'rejected'].includes(String(body.status))) {
updates.resolved_at = new Date().toISOString();
}
const { data, error } = await supabase
.from('customer_claims')
.update(updates)
.eq('id', claimId)
.eq('profile_id', companyId)
.select('*')
.single();
if (error) return NextResponse.json({ error: error.message }, { status: 500 });
return NextResponse.json({ success: true, claim: data });
} catch (e: unknown) {
return NextResponse.json({ error: e instanceof Error ? e.message : 'Error' }, { status: 500 });
}
}