Files
Open_Ultra_SAST/tests/test_model_specs.py
T
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 61811512a8 feat(facts): PHP semantic facts, validated against a real PHP CPG
contributor-scan 5.1, the first step toward the v0.1 WordPress target.

Written against a PHP CPG rather than against PHP source, because the two
do not look alike. Verified with joern-parse 4.0.623 / php2cpg on a probe:

  $_GET["name"]               ->  call `<operator>.indexAccess`, CODE $_GET["name"]
  mysqli_query($conn, $sql)   ->  call NAMED mysqli_query
  echo $_GET["msg"]           ->  call NAMED echo

So sources match on code and sinks match on name, and every entry the
probe did not exercise is marked unverified in the file -- `include` and
`require` among them, which is PHP's most characteristic path bug and the
first thing to check on a real checkout.

Five families derive (injection, output_encoding, path, deserialization,
untrusted_destination) with no sink that is its own sanitizer -- asserted
by a test, because that bug class has now appeared three times in three
matchers. `php` is added to the region model's languages, without which
the facts would have reached nothing.

The arbiter decides 4 of 4 on the probe: the SQL concat entails, its
`mysqli_real_escape_string` twin drops to corroborated, `echo` XSS entails
and `system` command injection entails.

**A whole scan finds 2 of those 3, and the gap is the finding.** PHP files
yield FILE-LEVEL regions because no PHP entry points are mapped, and the
taint arbiter returns one verdict per region per family -- so a file-level
region reports at most one injection finding however many it holds.
`system` won on flow length and the SQL injection went unreported. That is
the mirror image of task 2.9: that one is many regions collapsing to one
site, this is many sites collapsing to one verdict, and it bites hardest
exactly where PHP needs it not to, since a WordPress file is large and has
no decorator for the mapper to find.

Recorded as task 5.4 with WordPress's registration model (add_action,
add_filter, admin-ajax, REST routes), which the mapper already handles in
principle for other frameworks.

A 13-line probe is not a WordPress result. What is established is that the
seam works end to end for PHP; everything about scale and coverage is
unmeasured, and there are still zero PHP pairs in a corpus of 263 python,
351 c_cpp, 47 javascript and 49 java.

Gates byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-09 14:18:57 +02:00

287 lines
14 KiB
Python

"""model-grounded-detection task 1.1: the security vocabularies survive the modules that carried them.
The guard vocabulary lived in `semantic/variants.py`, whose optimisation loop this feature deletes. The
source/sink/sanitizer facts and the obligation facts live in `ruleset/` data and are retained, so the specs
*derive* from them rather than copying them — a copy would be a second place to update. What must be ported
verbatim is the guard vocabulary, because nothing else holds it.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import ast
from pathlib import Path
SPECS = Path("src/openultrasast/model/specs.py")
def test_the_guard_vocabulary_is_preserved_verbatim() -> None:
from openultrasast.model.specs import GUARD_KINDS
assert GUARD_KINDS == ("null_test", "bounds_test", "allowlist_test", "auth_check", "parameterized_call", "type_change", "none")
def test_the_guard_classifier_still_recognises_each_kind() -> None:
"""The patterns classify the *fix*, first match wins — the order is part of the vocabulary."""
from openultrasast.model.specs import classify_guard_text
assert classify_guard_text('cur.execute("SELECT * FROM t WHERE id = %s", (uid,))') == "parameterized_call"
assert classify_guard_text("if not current_user.is_authenticated: abort(403)") == "auth_check"
assert classify_guard_text("if name not in ALLOWED: abort(400)") == "allowlist_test"
assert classify_guard_text("if len(buf) > 64: return") == "bounds_test"
assert classify_guard_text("if value is None: return") == "null_test"
assert classify_guard_text("page = int(raw)") == "type_change"
assert classify_guard_text("total = total + 1") == "none"
def test_the_seeded_families_and_the_named_gaps_are_both_exact() -> None:
"""What the retained fact data can seed, and what it provably cannot — Req 9.2, a gap is *named*.
Task 4.2 closed the gap this test was written to hold open: `path`, `output_encoding`,
`untrusted_destination` and `prototype` now have sink facts routing to them by CWE. The set is still
asserted exactly, so a family can neither lose its seed nor gain one without this record moving.
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import dominance_specs, taint_specs
from openultrasast.model.taxonomy import load_families
taxonomy = load_families()
seeded = set()
for language in ("python", "javascript", "java", "c"):
seeded |= {spec.family for spec in taint_specs(language=language).values()}
seeded |= {spec.family for spec in dominance_specs(language=language).values()}
deferred = {"unknown", "memory"} # the declined bucket and the deferred execution tier
assert seeded == {
"injection",
"deserialization",
"config_secrets",
"access_control",
"path",
"output_encoding",
"untrusted_destination",
"prototype",
"memory",
}
gaps = {family.id for family in taxonomy.families} - seeded - deferred
assert gaps == set(), f"a family lost its seed: {sorted(gaps)}"
def test_the_injection_taint_spec_carries_sources_sinks_and_sanitizers() -> None:
from openultrasast.model.specs import taint_specs
spec = taint_specs(language="python")["injection"]
assert any("request.args" in source for source in spec.sources)
assert any(sink in ("eval", "exec", "os.system") for sink in spec.sinks)
assert spec.sanitizers, "a family with no sanitizer model can never distinguish a fixed twin"
def test_the_access_control_dominance_spec_carries_operations_and_dischargers() -> None:
from openultrasast.model.specs import dominance_specs
spec = dominance_specs(language="python")["access_control"]
assert any("filter_by" in operation for operation in spec.operations)
assert spec.dischargers, "an absence family with no discharger model can only ever report suspicion"
def test_specs_import_nothing_from_the_removed_packages() -> None:
"""Req 1.2: the vocabularies must not depend on the modules this feature deletes."""
tree = ast.parse(SPECS.read_text())
imported = set()
for node in ast.walk(tree):
if isinstance(node, ast.ImportFrom) and node.module:
imported.add(node.module)
elif isinstance(node, ast.Import):
imported.update(alias.name for alias in node.names)
forbidden = ("learning", "improve", "variants", "mechanisms", "evolve")
offending = [name for name in imported if any(token in name for token in forbidden)]
assert not offending, f"model/specs.py imports removed code: {offending}"
def test_the_specs_module_exposes_no_writer() -> None:
"""Req 7.4, the verifier boundary: the models are read-only data no LLM or optimiser can rewrite."""
tree = ast.parse(SPECS.read_text())
writers = [
node.name
for node in tree.body
if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef)
and any(node.name.startswith(verb) for verb in ("write", "save", "dump", "store", "append", "update", "set_"))
]
assert not writers, f"specs must be read-only, found writers: {writers}"
assert "open(" not in SPECS.read_text().replace("# ", ""), "specs must not open a file for writing"
def test_a_sink_is_never_its_own_sanitizer() -> None:
"""A parameterized fact names a safe sink *shape*, not a cleansing call on the path.
Two shipped facts have this shape: `parameterized_execute` ("execute with bound parameters is safe") and
C's `literal_format` ("printf with a constant format string is safe"). Flattened into the sanitizer list
each makes its sink its own sanitizer, so every flow through it reports as already-clean and nothing is
ever entailed. Both were caught on the first live Joern run — the second only because the first was fixed
as a class rather than as an instance.
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import taint_specs
for language in ("python", "javascript", "java", "c"):
for spec in taint_specs(language=language).values():
overlap = set(spec.sinks) & set(spec.sanitizers)
assert not overlap, f"{language}/{spec.family}: sink is its own sanitizer: {sorted(overlap)}"
def test_safe_shape_sinks_are_kept_for_the_shape_test() -> None:
from openultrasast.model.specs import taint_specs
spec = taint_specs(language="python")["injection"]
assert "execute" in spec.safe_shape_sinks, "the safe-shape names must survive for a later shape test"
assert "execute" not in spec.sanitizers
c_memory = taint_specs(language="c").get("memory")
assert c_memory is not None and "printf" in c_memory.safe_shape_sinks
def test_dischargers_carry_identity_tokens_but_not_the_negative_fields() -> None:
"""A discharger fact spreads across six fields and only three of them evidence a discharge.
`identity_sources` (current_user, request.user) is how an identity constraint is actually written, and
omitting it left the absence arbiter reporting "no guard" on handlers that plainly had one.
`request_sources` and `permissive_values` describe the vulnerable shape rather than the fix -- including
them would let the arbiter read a bug as its own fix. (`constraint_params` is excluded too, for a
different reason, covered by its own test.)
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import dominance_specs
from openultrasast.semantic.obligations import load_obligation_facts
spec = dominance_specs(language="python")["access_control"]
assert "current_user" in spec.dischargers
assert "login_required" in spec.dischargers # decorators still present
facts = load_obligation_facts().for_language("python")
negative = {p for fact in facts.dischargers for p in fact.request_sources} | {
v for fact in facts.dischargers for v in fact.permissive_values
}
assert not (negative & set(spec.dischargers)), "the negative fields must never read as a discharge"
def test_constraint_params_are_not_dischargers_on_their_own() -> None:
"""A field named `user_id` is what an IDOR is MADE OF, not what fixes one.
`filter_by(id=user_id)` with `user_id` taken off the request is the bug. The original checker only
counted an identity constraint whose value's provenance was the authenticated context, so the parameter
name alone evidences nothing. Treating it as a guard silenced the entire access_control family: on
threatbyte-api-v1-delete every operation reported as guarded, and the arbiter found no bug at all.
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import dominance_specs
from openultrasast.semantic.obligations import load_obligation_facts
spec = dominance_specs(language="python")["access_control"]
facts = load_obligation_facts().for_language("python")
params = {p for fact in facts.dischargers for p in fact.constraint_params}
assert params, "the fixture would be vacuous if the facts carried no constraint params"
assert not (params & set(spec.dischargers)), f"constraint params must not discharge alone: {sorted(params & set(spec.dischargers))}"
assert "current_user" in spec.dischargers, "identity sources still do discharge"
def test_configuration_facts_do_not_become_authorization_obligations() -> None:
"""contributor-scan 2.6. A permissive CORS origin is discharged by a VALUE, not by a guard.
Taking every obligation fact made `app.run(...)` an operation requiring an authorization check, and put
thirteen tokens in both the operation and the discharger list -- an obligation that is its own discharge,
the same shape as the taint sink that used to sanitize itself.
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import dominance_specs
spec = dominance_specs(language="python")["access_control"]
assert not set(spec.operations) & set(spec.dischargers), "nothing may be both the obligation and its discharge"
assert "app.run" not in spec.operations
assert "CORS" not in spec.operations
def test_input_validation_does_not_discharge_an_authorization_obligation() -> None:
"""`jsonschema.validate` establishes the shape of a request, never who is making it."""
from openultrasast.model.specs import dominance_specs
spec = dominance_specs(language="python")["access_control"]
assert "validate" not in spec.dischargers
assert "parse_obj" not in spec.dischargers
assert "token_validator" in spec.dischargers, "a real route guard must survive the filter"
def test_a_guard_discharges_only_the_obligation_it_is_a_guard_of() -> None:
"""The relation the facts state, which the flat list was throwing away.
`filter_by` requires an identity_constraint or an ownership_check; `token_validator` is a path_guard.
Pooled together, authenticating the caller discharged an object-level obligation, so a handler that
authenticates and then looks the record up by a PATH parameter read as fully guarded -- VAmPI's broken
object-level authorization, and the shape of most real IDORs.
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import dominance_specs
spec = dominance_specs(language="python")["access_control"]
assert spec.requirements["filter_by"] == ("identity_constraint", "ownership_check")
identity = set(spec.dischargers_by_kind["identity_constraint"])
assert "token_validator" not in identity, "authentication is not an object-level check"
assert "token_validator" in set(spec.dischargers_by_kind["path_guard"])
assert "['sub']" in identity or '["sub"]' in identity
def test_a_sink_is_matched_as_a_word_not_a_substring() -> None:
"""contributor-scan: `fgets` contains `gets`, and the safe API is not the dangerous one.
The sink matcher's last clause was an unbounded `methodFullName.contains(n)`, so every bounded read in
libpng matched the sink for the unbounded one: all 26 entailed findings on that repository were the same
false positive, `*argv -> fgets(buf, 256, f)`. Third instance of this bug class here, after the sanitizer
that matched `resolve` inside `resolveUrl` and the discharger that matched `user` inside `users`.
The query is Scala, so this asserts the fact tables still carry the pair that made it visible; the
boundary itself is exercised against a real CPG in the repository measurements.
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import taint_specs
memory = taint_specs(language="c")["memory"]
assert "gets" in memory.sinks, "the unbounded read is a sink"
assert "fgets" in memory.sources, "the bounded read is a SOURCE of untrusted input, never a sink"
assert "fgets" not in memory.sinks
def test_php_facts_derive_the_families_a_web_application_needs() -> None:
"""contributor-scan 5.1, toward the WordPress target.
Written against a real PHP CPG rather than against PHP source, because the two do not look alike: a
superglobal is an `<operator>.indexAccess` whose CODE reads `$_GET["name"]`, while a dangerous operation
is a plain call named `mysqli_query` or `echo`. Sources therefore match on code and sinks on name.
"""
from openultrasast.model.specs import taint_specs
families = taint_specs(language="php")
assert {"injection", "output_encoding", "path", "deserialization", "untrusted_destination"} <= set(families)
injection = families["injection"]
assert "mysqli_query" in injection.sinks, "SQL"
assert "system" in injection.sinks, "command execution"
assert "$_GET" in injection.sources, "a superglobal is matched on the code of an index access"
assert "echo" in families["output_encoding"].sinks, "PHP's XSS sink is a language construct php2cpg emits as a call"
def test_no_php_sink_is_its_own_sanitizer() -> None:
"""The bug class this codebase has hit three times, asserted for the newest fact table before it can."""
from openultrasast.model.specs import taint_specs
for family, spec in taint_specs(language="php").items():
assert not set(spec.sinks) & set(spec.sanitizers), f"{family}: an operation that discharges itself can never be reported"
def test_a_php_file_can_become_a_region() -> None:
"""Facts alone reach nothing: `_LANGUAGES` decides whether a file is offered to the model layer at all."""
from openultrasast.model.regions import regions_for
class _Target:
path = "wp-admin/admin-ajax.php"
language = "php"
loc = 100
tags: tuple[str, ...] = ()
regions = regions_for([], [_Target()])
assert regions, "a php file with no entry point should still yield a file-level region"
assert regions[0].language == "php"