Files
Open_Ultra_SAST/.opencode/skills/kiro-spec-status/SKILL.md
T
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 4.8 6699f1f8f9 chore: add kiro spec-driven tooling and steering docs
Add the Kiro-style agentic SDLC tooling used to drive this project: the
.opencode/skills/kiro-* skill set (discovery, spec init/requirements/design/
tasks, validation, implementation, review, steering), the .kiro/settings
templates, and AGENTS.md describing the workflow. Update the spec docs
(assessment/design/requirements/tasks) to current state.

Scope tests/test_opencode_skills.py to the project's own openultrasast-*
skills so the third-party kiro-* tooling (which uses a different frontmatter
convention) no longer breaks the frontmatter check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
2026-06-21 14:28:19 +02:00

2.8 KiB

name, description
name description
kiro-spec-status Show specification status and progress

Specification Status

<background_information>

  • Success Criteria:
    • Show current phase and completion status
    • Identify next actions and blockers
    • Provide clear visibility into progress
    • Surface boundary readiness, upstream/downstream context, and likely revalidation needs when available </background_information>
## Execution Steps

Step 1: Load Spec Context

  • Read .kiro/specs/$1/spec.json for metadata and phase status
  • Read .kiro/specs/$1/brief.md if it exists
  • Read existing files: requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md (if they exist)
  • Check .kiro/specs/$1/ directory for available files
  • Read .kiro/steering/roadmap.md if it exists and this spec appears in it

Step 2: Analyze Status

Parse each phase:

  • Requirements: Count requirements and acceptance criteria
  • Design: Check for architecture, components, diagrams, and whether boundary sections are present
  • Tasks: Count completed vs total tasks (parse - [x] vs - [ ])
  • Approvals: Check approval status in spec.json
  • Boundary context:
    • From brief.md: note Boundary Candidates, Upstream / Downstream, and Existing Spec Touchpoints if present
    • From design.md: note Boundary Commitments, Out of Boundary, Allowed Dependencies, and Revalidation Triggers if present
    • From roadmap.md: note upstream dependencies and whether this spec is adjacent to Existing Spec Updates
  • Revalidation watchlist:
    • Identify downstream specs, neighboring existing-spec updates, or rollout-sensitive design notes that may need revalidation if this spec changes
    • Call out when the current spec shape looks too broad and may want roadmap/design splitting instead of more local repair

Step 3: Generate Report

Create report in the language specified in spec.json covering:

  1. Current Phase & Progress: Where the spec is in the workflow
  2. Completion Status: Percentage complete for each phase
  3. Task Breakdown: If tasks exist, show completed/remaining counts
  4. Boundary Context: Upstream/downstream, out-of-boundary, and allowed dependency notes when available
  5. Revalidation Watchlist: Downstream or adjacent work likely affected by changes to this spec
  6. Next Actions: What needs to be done next
  7. Blockers: Any issues preventing progress

Safety & Fallback

Error Scenarios

Spec Not Found:

  • Message: "No spec found for $1. Check available specs in .kiro/specs/"
  • Action: List available spec directories

Incomplete Spec:

  • Warning: Identify which files are missing
  • Suggested Action: Point to next phase command

List All Specs

To see all available specs:

  • Run with no argument or use wildcard
  • Shows all specs in .kiro/specs/ with their status