Open_Ultra_SAST/src/openultrasast/cpg/queries/taint.sc

// Taint reachability for one flow family (model-grounded-detection Req 6.1).
//
// The question this answers is the one our flat IR could not: does an untrusted source reach the labeled sink
// *through resolved dataflow*, and is there a sanitizer on that path. `reachableByFlows` walks the PDG, so a
// value bound several statements upstream is found:
//
//     cmd  = request.args["cmd"]        request.args["cmd"] -> cmd -> "echo " + cmd -> full
//     full = "echo " + cmd
//     os.system(full)
//
// That three-hop chain is exactly the one-hop limit which held our measured entailment at 2.2%.
//
// Two things here are easy to get backwards and were, first time round:
//   * the sink is the call's ARGUMENTS, not the call node -- data flows into arguments;
//   * `reachableByFlows` is called ON the sink WITH the source, not the other way about.
//
// Parameters (comma-separated where plural):
//   cpgFile, sources, sinks, sanitizers (optional), function (optional: restrict to this method AND any
//     closure lexically nested inside it -- see `nestedInLabeled`),
//   parameterSources ("true" to treat the labeled function's parameters as untrusted -- see below),
//   file (optional: restrict sinks to this source file),
//   callDepth (optional: how many call-graph levels below the labeled method may hold a sink),
//   boundedSinks (optional: sinks whose danger is a LENGTH, which a dominating bound discharges)
//
// `file` is what makes a region with no enclosing function askable at all. Without it such a region sends
//   function="" and matches every sink in the repository, and the driver attributes that whole answer to
//   whichever region asked. Scoping by file also stops a named function matching a same-named function in
//   another module, which a corpus of one-file excerpts could never surface.
//
// Output: a fenced JSON array of {sink, sinkLine, sinkMethod, source, sanitized, length}. The fence exists
// because Joern prints a banner, pass logs and a prompt around whatever a script emits.

// BATCHED. `requests` is a JSON object of {id: {sources, sinks, sanitizers, function, parameterSources}} and
// the output is {id: [row, ...]}. One invocation answers a whole scan's questions, because the JVM start
// (~30s) dwarfs the queries themselves once the CPG is loaded -- one call per region per family put a
// ten-line file at four minutes and a thousand regions at roughly fifty hours.
//
// The single-request form is kept below it: the pair harnesses and every measurement committed so far use it,
// and changing their call shape would silently invalidate comparisons against those artifacts.

@main def exec(
    cpgFile: String,
    sources: String = "",
    sinks: String = "",
    sanitizers: String = "",
    function: String = "",
    file: String = "",
    callDepth: String = "0",
    boundedSinks: String = "",
    parameterSources: String = "false",
    fieldSources: String = "true",
    evidenceOnly: String = "false",
    hookCallbacks: String = "",
    dispatchApply: String = "",
    requests: String = "",
    requestsFile: String = ""
) = {
  importCpg(cpgFile)

  // The batch arrives as a FILE. A single command-line argument is capped at 128KB on Linux and a
  // repository's requests are megabytes, so passing them as `--param requests=` failed with E2BIG and the
  // driver read the empty result as "no rows". `requests` is kept for the single-request forms and the tests.
  val requestsJson =
    if (requestsFile.nonEmpty) scala.io.Source.fromFile(requestsFile).mkString
    else requests

  def split(raw: String): List[String] = raw.split(",").map(_.trim).filter(_.nonEmpty).toList

  // Per-family answers that do not depend on the region, kept across the whole batch.
  val familyInRepoMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[String, Boolean]
  val sinkCandidatesMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[String, List[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call]]
  val reachableMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[(String, String, Int), Set[String]]
  val methodSourceMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[String, Boolean]
  val fedFieldsMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[String, Map[String, String]]
  val sourceMethodsMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[String, Set[String]]
  val callbackFedMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[String, String]
  // These four lived INSIDE `rowsFor` until 2026-09-11, which is to say they memoised nothing across the
  // requests of a batch: every pair re-walked the file's methods, re-collected its seeds, and re-ran the
  // field join's flow queries. Keyed by the parameters the answer depends on, so one family's seeds never
  // answer another's.
  val methodsByFile  = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[String, List[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Method]]
  val seedsByFile    = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[(String, String, String), List[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.CfgNode]]
  val fieldTaintMemo = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[(String, String, String, String, String), Boolean]
  val hookKeysMemo   = scala.collection.mutable.Map.empty[(String, String, String), Set[String]]

  def rowsFor(
      sourcesS: String,
      sinksS: String,
      sanitizersS: String,
      hookCallbacksS: String,
      dispatchApplyS: String,
      functionS: String,
      paramSrc: String,
      fieldSrc: String,
      evidenceS: String,
      fileS: String,
      depthS: String,
      boundedS: String,
      contextS: String = ""
  ): List[ujson.Obj] = {

  // Word-boundary matching, never substring. `resolveUrl` contains `resolve`, so a bare-substring sanitizer
  // test marked the VULNERABLE flow sanitized and the verdict fell back to a captured `res` that names no
  // attacker input. Same bug class as the dominance query's guard matching; fixed in both.
  // The boundary only applies where there IS a word character to bound: a token like `input(` ends in `(`,
  // and an unconditional lookahead would make it unmatchable in `input(x)`.
  def boundedPattern(token: String): java.util.regex.Pattern = {
    val before = if (token.headOption.exists(c => c.isLetterOrDigit || c == '_')) "(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])" else ""
    val after = if (token.lastOption.exists(c => c.isLetterOrDigit || c == '_')) "(?![A-Za-z0-9_])" else ""
    java.util.regex.Pattern.compile(before + java.util.regex.Pattern.quote(token) + after)
  }

  def mentionsToken(code: String, tokens: List[String]): Boolean =
    tokens.exists(t => boundedPattern(t).matcher(code).find())

  val sourcePatterns = split(sourcesS)
  val sinkNames      = split(sinksS)
  val sanitizerNames = split(sanitizersS)
  val boundedNames   = split(boundedS)

  // A relational comparison against an integer literal: `len > 250`, `n <= sizeof(buf)`. Equality and null
  // checks are deliberately excluded -- `if (buf)` and `p == NULL` govern whether the sink RUNS, not how
  // much it copies, and counting them would discharge every guarded-against-null overflow there is.
  val boundShape = java.util.regex.Pattern.compile("(?:<=|>=|<|>)\\s*[0-9]+|[0-9]+\\s*(?:<=|>=|<|>)")
  val function       = functionS
  val parameterSources = paramSrc

  // A source is any call whose code contains one of the patterns. Matching on `code` rather than a method
  // name keeps `request.args["x"]` (an indexAccess over a fieldAccess) and `req.body.name` both reachable
  // without a per-framework rule for each.
  // Framework sources: a call whose code contains one of the patterns. Matching on `code` rather than a
  // method name keeps `request.args["x"]` (an indexAccess over a fieldAccess) and `req.body.name` both
  // reachable without a per-framework rule for each.
  def frameworkSources = cpg.call.filter(c => sourcePatterns.exists(p => c.code.contains(p)))

  // The labeled methods, and the region they lexically own. A closure defined inside the labeled function --
  // the callback passed to `fs.stat`, say -- has its own synthetic method (`<lambda>0`) whose astParentFullName
  // is empty, so nesting is decided by line-range containment within the same file, which is reliable.
  // Resolved by name AND file when a file is given: `get_user` exists in more than one module of a real
  // repository, and a corpus of one-file excerpts could never show that.
  lazy val labeledMethods = {
    val byName = if (function.isEmpty) List.empty else cpg.method.nameExact(function).l
    if (fileS.isEmpty) byName else byName.filter(_.filename.endsWith(fileS))
  }

  // The methods a sink may live in. Lexical nesting alone stops at the function boundary, and a real
  // injection bug rarely respects it: VAmPI's is a request parameter reaching a handler, passed to a method
  // in another module, interpolated there and executed. `reachableByFlows` already follows calls; what did
  // not was the QUESTION -- sinks were filtered to the labeled function's own body, so the flow had no sink
  // to end at and the engine was silent.
  //
  // Bounded by `callDepth`, because "every method transitively reachable from an entry point" is most of a
  // repository, and an unbounded question is how this becomes slow again.
  val depth = scala.util.Try(depthS.toInt).getOrElse(0)
  lazy val reachableMethods: Set[String] = reachableMemo.getOrElseUpdate((function, fileS, depth), computeReachable)

  def computeReachable: Set[String] =
    if (depth <= 0 || labeledMethods.isEmpty) Set.empty
    else {
      var frontier = labeledMethods.toSet
      var seen     = frontier.map(_.fullName)
      var level    = 0
      while (level < depth && frontier.nonEmpty) {
        val next = frontier.flatMap(_.callee.l).filterNot(m => seen.contains(m.fullName))
        seen = seen ++ next.map(_.fullName)
        frontier = next
        level += 1
      }
      seen
    }

  // A module body spans its whole file, so line-range containment would make `<module>` the parent of every
  // function in it -- and a module-scope region would then report every handler's sinks a second time. The
  // module region exists to cover the code that is in NO function, so its membership is direct.
  val moduleScope = function == "<module>"

  def nestedInLabeled(m: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Method): Boolean =
    if (moduleScope) m.name == function
    else
      labeledMethods.exists { lm =>
        m.name == function || (
          m.filename == lm.filename &&
          m.lineNumber.getOrElse(-1) >= lm.lineNumber.getOrElse(0) &&
          m.lineNumberEnd.getOrElse(-1) <= lm.lineNumberEnd.getOrElse(Int.MaxValue)
        )
      }

  // Parameter sources: the labeled function's OWN parameters, never a nested closure's. In a function-level
  // pair the function boundary IS the trust boundary -- the corpus is built so the labeled function's inputs
  // are attacker-controlled -- and 39 of the injection slice's 50 pairs carry no framework token at all. Our
  // flat-IR baseline counted these (`source_kinds: ["parameter"]`), so the comparison is only like-for-like
  // with them on. Scoping matters as much as enabling: a callback's own parameters (`err`, `stats`) are not
  // attacker input, and counting them produced flows like `res -> readFileSync` that name no real source.
  // Off by default: outside a labeled function, treating every parameter as untrusted is not sound.
  //
  // The RECEIVER is excluded, and only because the field half below makes that safe. `$this` is a parameter
  // in the CPG -- index 0 of every PHP method -- and counting it means every method that reads any field
  // reaches every sink: 11 of 15 entailed findings on one PMPro class were `this -> $wpdb->...`, one of them
  // surviving into 2.9.8 at a query whose every fragment is `esc_sql`-wrapped.
  //
  // Excluding it was TRIED FIRST and reverted, because on its own it loses CVE-2023-6559: MW WP Form's
  // `_delete_files()` takes no parameters at all and its attacker-controlled path arrives as
  // `$this->attachments`. Trading a verified CVE for findings merely suspected of being false is the wrong
  // trade, and deleting the receiver removes the symptom by removing the evidence.
  //
  // With `fieldSourceNodes` below, that path is carried by the field it actually travels through, so the
  // receiver no longer has to stand in for it. The order matters: this line is only correct because of the
  // one after it.
  def parameterNodes =
    if (parameterSources != "true") Iterator.empty
    else if (function.isEmpty) cpg.method.parameter.filterNot(_.name == "this").iterator
    else cpg.method.nameExact(function).parameter.filterNot(_.name == "this").iterator

  // The region this request is about, as a predicate on the method. Named rather than inlined because the
  // field sources have to be scoped to exactly the same place as the sinks, and a second copy of these
  // three branches is precisely the drift this file has been bitten by before.
  def inScope(m: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Method): Boolean =
    if (function.isEmpty) {
      // A region with no enclosing function: the file IS the scope.
      fileS.isEmpty || m.filename.endsWith(fileS)
    } else if (depth > 0) {
      // Following the call graph means leaving the region's file on purpose, so the file filter would
      // contradict the point. The reachable set is the scope, and the row reports where the sink landed.
      nestedInLabeled(m) || reachableMethods.contains(m.fullName)
    } else {
      (fileS.isEmpty || m.filename.endsWith(fileS)) && nestedInLabeled(m)
    }

  // ---- the field half of the two-stage join (task 5.11) ---------------------------------------------
  //
  // `_delete_files()` takes no parameters at all. Its attacker-controlled path arrives as a FIELD, written
  // by one method and read back by another:
  //
  //     public function __construct( ..., array $attachments = array() )   // a parameter
  //         $this->attachments = $attachments;                             // half one ends here
  //     protected function _delete_files()
  //         foreach ( $this->attachments as $file )                        // half two starts here
  //             unlink( $file );                                           // CVE-2023-6559
  //
  // Both halves are already in the graph: parameter to assignment inside one method, field read to sink
  // inside another. Only the JOIN between them is missing, and the key it joins on is the literal
  // `$this->attachments`, written identically at both ends. So this is a second question asked with the
  // query that already exists, not an edge a frontend has to invent.
  //
  // The alternative is making `$this` itself a source. That finds this CVE and eleven false positives with
  // it on one PMPro class, because every method that reads any field then reaches every sink. A field name
  // is the precision, and it costs one string comparison.
  //
  // Scoped three ways, so a field name common to every class ever written cannot become a wormhole:
  //   * only fields the sink scope actually READS are considered;
  //   * only assignments in the SAME FILE count;
  //   * the assignment's right-hand side must itself be reachable from a source -- which is the whole claim.
  val FIELD_ACCESS = "<operator>.fieldAccess"
  val ASSIGNMENT   = "<operator>.assignment"

  // Memoized per FIELD, not per file, because the expensive part is one flow query per candidate assignment
  // and only the fields some region actually reads are worth asking about. A batch asks about one file many
  // times over -- 205 requests across 41 regions of one class -- so without a memo this runs hundreds of
  // times over the same assignments.

  def methodsIn(fileName: String) =
    methodsByFile.getOrElseUpdate(fileName, cpg.method.filter(m => fileName.isEmpty || m.filename.endsWith(fileName)).l)

  // Framework sources are untrusted wherever they appear. Parameters are untrusted only where the caller has
  // said this region is an entry point -- the same contract `parameterNodes` carries, and for the same
  // reason: an arbitrary helper's parameters carry whatever its caller happened to have.
  def seedsIn(fileName: String) =
    seedsByFile.getOrElseUpdate(
      (sourcesS, paramSrc, fileName), {
        val methods = methodsIn(fileName)
        val framework: List[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.CfgNode] =
          methods.flatMap(_.ast.isCall.filter(c => sourcePatterns.exists(p => c.code.contains(p))).l)
        val params: List[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.CfgNode] =
          if (parameterSources == "true") methods.flatMap(_.parameter.l) else Nil
        framework ++ params
      }
    )

  def fieldIsTainted(fileName: String, fieldCode: String): Boolean =
    fieldTaintMemo.getOrElseUpdate(
      (sourcesS, paramSrc, sanitizersS, fileName, fieldCode), {
        val seeds = seedsIn(fileName)
        if (seeds.isEmpty) false
        else
          methodsIn(fileName).flatMap(_.ast.isCall.nameExact(ASSIGNMENT).l).exists { assignment =>
            val args = assignment.argument.l
            args.size >= 2 && (args.head match {
              case target: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call
                  if target.name == FIELD_ACCESS && target.code.trim == fieldCode =>
                // The summary must carry the SANITIZATION status of the half it summarises, not merely its
                // reachability. Asking only "does a source reach this assignment" marks
                // `$this->sqlQuery = "..." . esc_sql($x) . "..."` tainted, and PMPro builds most of its
                // queries that way: the fixed side of its pair went from 1 finding to 13 without this,
                // which is the pair no longer separating at all.
                val flows = args(1).start.reachableByFlows(seeds.iterator).l
                flows.exists(f => !f.elements.map(_.code).l.exists(code => mentionsToken(code, sanitizerNames)))
              case _ => false
            })
          }
      }
    )

  // A read of a MEMBER of a tainted object is tainted too. WP Statistics assigns the whole request to
  // `$this->rest_hits` in one method and reads `$this->rest_hits->current_page_id` in another, so an exact
  // code match sees two unrelated strings where the source text says one is inside the other. Every prefix
  // that ends on a `->` boundary is checked, left to right.
  def taintedPrefixes(code: String, fileName: String): Boolean = {
    val parts = code.split("->").map(_.trim).filter(_.nonEmpty)
    if (parts.length < 2) false
    else (2 to parts.length).exists(n => fieldIsTainted(fileName, parts.take(n).mkString("->")))
  }

  // Off by request only, and defaulting to ON when the field is absent, so nothing about the shipped
  // behaviour depends on a caller remembering to set it. It exists so the join can be measured against
  // itself: a cost you cannot switch off is a cost you cannot attribute.
  def fieldSourceNodes =
    if (fieldSrc != "true") Iterator.empty
    else {
      val reads = cpg.call.nameExact(FIELD_ACCESS).filter(c => inScope(c.method)).l
      if (reads.isEmpty) Iterator.empty else reads.filter(r => taintedPrefixes(r.code.trim, fileS)).iterator
    }

  // ---- the hook half of the two-stage join (task 5.11) ----------------------------------------------
  //
  // WP Statistics' CVE-2022-25148 has a modelled source, a modelled sink and `esc_sql` as its fix, and is
  // invisible on both sides, because the only thing joining the two files is
  //
  //     add_filter('wp_statistics_current_page', array($this, 'set_current_page'));   // hits.php:43
  //     return apply_filters('wp_statistics_current_page', $current_page);            // pages.php:105
  //
  // Both ends name the callback with a STRING, and php2cpg drops the callback argument entirely -- the CPG
  // literally holds `add_filter("wp_statistics_current_page", )`. So the link CANNOT come from the graph at
  // any price, and it arrives instead as `hookCallbacks`, read out of the source text by
  // `mapping.php_hook_callbacks` where both ends are literals.
  //
  // The rule: an `apply_filters('H', ...)` call is a SOURCE when some callback registered for H returns
  // data that an unsanitized flow reached. That is the same question as the field half, against a different
  // key.
  // The registry's vocabulary arrives as a FACT, never as a constant here. `apply_filters` is WordPress's
  // name for this; Django signals, jQuery events and Symfony's dispatcher all have their own, and each is a
  // row in a semantic fact table rather than an edit to this query.
  val hookApply = split(dispatchApplyS).toSet

  val hookTable: Map[String, List[String]] =
    hookCallbacksS
      .split(";")
      .map(_.trim)
      .filter(_.nonEmpty)
      .flatMap { entry =>
        val at = entry.indexOf(':')
        if (at <= 0 || at == entry.length - 1) None else Some(entry.substring(0, at) -> entry.substring(at + 1))
      }
      .groupBy(_._1)
      .map { case (hook, pairs) => hook -> pairs.map(_._2).toList }

  def unquote(raw: String): String = {
    val t = raw.trim
    if (t.length >= 2 && ((t.head == '"' && t.last == '"') || (t.head == '\'' && t.last == '\''))) t.substring(1, t.length - 1) else t
  }

  // Half one's seeds are STRICTER than the field half's, and deliberately. A filter callback's own parameter
  // is the value being filtered, not request data, and the receiver is the object -- counting either makes
  // every registered callback "return tainted" and the join degenerates into the complete graph this design
  // exists to refuse. Only a real framework source, or a field already shown to hold one, counts.
  //
  // They are NOT scoped to the requesting file, which the field half is: a hook registry is global by
  // construction, `set_current_page` lives in one file and the `apply_filters` that calls it in another,
  // and the query returned nothing while they were. They ARE scoped to the CALLBACK's file. The first
  // version scoped them to nothing -- every field access in every method of the repository, each put through
  // the field join -- and on a 637-file plugin that step alone did not finish in 270 s, for a callback whose
  // sources are, by the join's own logic, the reads in its body and the assignments in its class. WP
  // Statistics is the case that has to survive: the callback and `$this->rest_hits = ...` share a file,
  // and only the sink is elsewhere. Task 5.13 has the numbers.
  def hookSeedsOf(callback: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Method) = {
    val framework: List[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.CfgNode] =
      callback.ast.isCall.filter(c => sourcePatterns.exists(p => c.code.contains(p))).l
    val fields: List[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.CfgNode] =
      callback.ast.isCall.nameExact(FIELD_ACCESS).l.filter(r => taintedPrefixes(r.code.trim, callback.filename))
    framework ++ fields
  }

  // Half one is asked PER ARRAY KEY, not per callback, and that distinction is the whole result.
  //
  // "Does an unsanitized value reach this callback's return" is true on BOTH sides of the WP Statistics
  // pair, because the fix escapes two of the three members and leaves the third alone:
  //
  //     vulnerable   $tmp["id"] = $this->rest_hits->current_page_id
  //     fixed        $tmp["id"] = esc_sql($this->rest_hits->current_page_id)
  //     both         $tmp["search_query"] = ... unescaped, and harmless where it is used
  //
  // A callback-level answer flags the fixed side exactly as readily as the vulnerable one, which is a leak
  // and not a detection. The key is a literal at both ends -- written `"id"` in the callback and `['id']`
  // at the sink -- so it joins the same way the hook name and the field name do. Third use of one idea.
  val INDEX_ACCESS = "<operator>.indexAccess"

  def keyOf(access: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call): String =
    access.argument.l.lift(1).map(a => unquote(a.code)).getOrElse("")

  def taintedKeysOf(callback: String): Set[String] =
    hookKeysMemo.getOrElseUpdate(
      (sourcesS, sanitizersS, callback),
      cpg.method
        .nameExact(callback)
        .l
        .flatMap { method =>
          val seeds = hookSeedsOf(method)
          if (seeds.isEmpty) Nil
          else
            method.ast.isCall
              .nameExact(ASSIGNMENT)
              .l
              .flatMap { assignment =>
                val args = assignment.argument.l
                if (args.size < 2) None
                else
                  args.head match {
                    case target: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call if target.name == INDEX_ACCESS =>
                      val key = keyOf(target)
                      if (key.isEmpty) None
                      else if (args(1).start.reachableByFlows(seeds.iterator).l.exists(f => !f.elements.l.exists(sanitizesHere)))
                        Some(key)
                      else None
                    case _ => None
                  }
              }
        }
        .toSet
    )

  def hookSourceNodes =
    if (hookTable.isEmpty || hookApply.isEmpty) Iterator.empty
    else {
      val applies = cpg.call.filter(c => hookApply.contains(c.name)).filter(c => inScope(c.method)).l
      if (applies.isEmpty) Iterator.empty
      else {
        val keys = applies.flatMap { call =>
          val hook = call.argument.l.headOption.map(a => unquote(a.code)).getOrElse("")
          hookTable.getOrElse(hook, Nil).flatMap(taintedKeysOf)
        }.toSet
        if (keys.isEmpty) Iterator.empty
        else
          cpg.call
            .nameExact(INDEX_ACCESS)
            .filter(c => inScope(c.method))
            .l
            .filter(access => keys.contains(keyOf(access)))
            // ...and actually derived from the filtered value, not merely sharing a key name with it.
            .filter(access => access.start.reachableBy(applies.iterator).nonEmpty)
            .iterator
      }
    }

  // Materialised ONCE per request, because every one of the four is a `def` that walks the graph --
  // `frameworkSources` scans every call in the repository, `hookSourceNodes` runs one `reachableBy` per
  // candidate index access -- and `sourceNodes` is consumed once per SINK. A file-scope region with 346 sinks
  // paid for 346 repository scans and 346 hook joins. Measured on ten real pmpro pairs at callDepth 1:
  // 16.5 s per request with the hook half off, past 54 s with it on, before this; see task 5.13.
  lazy val frameworkList = frameworkSources.l
  lazy val parameterList = parameterNodes.toList
  lazy val fieldList     = fieldSourceNodes.toList
  lazy val hookList      = hookSourceNodes.toList
  def sourceNodes = frameworkList.iterator ++ parameterList.iterator ++ fieldList.iterator ++ hookList.iterator

  // WHICH KIND of source a flow started from, reported per row so the driver can tell them apart.
  //
  // It has to be reported rather than guessed, because by the time a row reaches Python a hook source reads
  // as `$current_page["id"]` and a parameter reads as `$args` -- two identifiers, indistinguishable. The
  // driver treats parameter-sourced flows as a FALLBACK it discards whenever a real modelled source is also
  // present, which is right for parameters and wrong for these: on WP Statistics, seven sanitized
  // `$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]` flows displaced the unsanitized hook flow carrying CVE-2022-25148, and the
  // finding disappeared between the query and the verdict.
  lazy val frameworkIds = frameworkList.map(_.id).toSet
  lazy val fieldIds     = fieldList.map(_.id).toSet
  lazy val hookIds      = hookList.map(_.id).toSet

  def sourceKindOf(head: Option[io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.AstNode]): String =
    head match {
      case Some(node) if frameworkIds.contains(node.id) => "framework"
      case Some(node) if hookIds.contains(node.id)      => "hook"
      case Some(node) if fieldIds.contains(node.id)     => "field"
      case Some(_)                                      => "parameter"
      case None                                         => ""
    }

  // Whether there is anything to trace from at all. Asking `reachableByFlows` with an empty source list is
  // not merely wasted work: Joern answers it by logging "Attempting to determine flows from empty list of
  // sources." to STDOUT, which lands between the fence markers and makes the whole batch's JSON unparseable.
  // The driver then reports `query_failed` for every request in the batch, so one method with no sources
  // silently costs the answers for all two hundred of the others. Excluding the receiver made that common:
  // a method whose only parameter is `$this` now has none.
  lazy val hasSources = sourceNodes.hasNext

  // A sink call: matched by short name (`system`), by leading code (`os.system(...)`), or by resolved
  // full name (`os.py:<module>.system`), so both bare and dotted forms in the spec hit.
  //
  // Every clause is word-BOUNDED, and the unbounded `contains` that used to end this list is why: `fgets`
  // contains `gets`, so every bounded read in libpng matched the sink for the unbounded one, and all 26
  // entailed findings on that repository were the same false positive -- `*argv -> fgets(buf, 256, f)`,
  // which is the safe API being reported as the dangerous one. Third instance of this bug class here, after
  // the sanitizer that matched `resolve` inside `resolveUrl` and the discharger that matched `user` inside
  // `users`; the sink matcher had simply never been given the same treatment.
  def sinkMatches(c: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call, n: String): Boolean =
    c.name == n || c.code.startsWith(n + "(") || mentionsToken(c.code, List(n)) || mentionsToken(c.methodFullName, List(n))

  // Does THIS path element cleanse the value flowing through it?
  //
  // The old test asked whether a sanitizer's name appeared anywhere in the element's source text, and that
  // is wrong on exactly the shape WordPress writes. WP Statistics' vulnerable query is one concatenation:
  //
  //     "... " . (array_key_exists(...) ? "AND `uri` = '" . esc_sql($page_uri) . "'" : "")
  //             . "AND `id` = {$current_page['id']}"
  //
  // `esc_sql` cleanses `$page_uri`. It does nothing whatsoever for `$current_page['id']`, which is the
  // injectable value and CVE-2022-25148 -- but both live in one expression, so the concatenation node's
  // code mentions `esc_sql` and the whole flow read as sanitized. A sibling's cleansing was being credited
  // to its neighbour.
  //
  // So the element must BE the cleansing, not merely contain a mention of one:
  //   * a call to the sanitizer -- by node name, or by its code opening with `name(`;
  //   * the sanitizer named as a string literal, which is how `array_map('esc_sql', $status)` applies it and
  //     is a form PMPro actually writes.
  def sanitizesHere(node: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.AstNode): Boolean = {
    val code = node.code
    val byName = node match {
      case call: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call => sanitizerNames.exists(n => call.name == n)
      case _                                                        => false
    }
    byName || sanitizerNames.exists(n => code.startsWith(n + "(") || code.contains("'" + n + "'") || code.contains("\"" + n + "\""))
  }

  // The candidate sink calls for a FAMILY do not depend on the region, and scanning every call in the graph
  // for each of 2,487 requests was a large share of what made a request cost seconds -- in evidence mode,
  // which asks for no dataflow at all, it alone took a query past an hour. Scanned once per sink list and
  // kept for the batch; the per-request work is the scope filter over that list.
  def sinkCalls =
    sinkCandidatesMemo
      .getOrElseUpdate(sinksS, cpg.call.filter(c => sinkNames.exists(n => sinkMatches(c, n))).l)
      .filter(c => inScope(c.method))

  // ---- stage one of the two-stage join WITHOUT dataflow, for evidence mode (flow-aware-ranking, phase 2) --
  //
  // The arbiter's `carried` runs a `reachableByFlows` per candidate assignment, and over a whole
  // repository's evidence pass that was not a cost but a wall: pmpro's 22,315 pairs went from 255 s to
  // past 1,800 s and answered nothing. Evidence is allowed to be a structural proxy -- the brief says so
  // of every path field -- so this asks the cheap form of the same two questions: is a field the region
  // reads ASSIGNED, anywhere in its file, from a source expression or from a parameter of the assigning
  // method (`$this->attachments = $attachments` in a constructor is the MW WP Form case); and does a hook
  // applied in scope have a registered callback whose body holds a source or such a field read (WP
  // Statistics's `set_current_page`). Memoised per file and per callback for the batch. It orders; the
  // arbiter still decides with the flow.
  // Provenance matters: "source" (assigned from a source expression, or from a same-file method that
  // reads one) is the strong form and promotes a tier; "parameter" (assigned from a parameter of the
  // assigning method -- every constructor does this) is weak and only orders within one. Measured: with
  // the two folded together tier 4 held 555 of pmpro's regions and 569 of WP Statistics's.
  def strongest(kinds: Iterable[String]): String =
    if (kinds.exists(_ == "source")) "source" else if (kinds.exists(_ == "parameter")) "parameter" else ""

  def prefixKind(code: String, fed: Map[String, String]): String = {
    val parts = code.split("->").map(_.trim).filter(_.nonEmpty)
    if (parts.length < 2) "" else strongest((2 to parts.length).flatMap(n => fed.get(parts.take(n).mkString("->"))))
  }

  // Methods of a file whose body reads a source: one level of "assigned from a call". WP Statistics writes
  // `$this->rest_hits = (object) self::rest_params()` and `rest_params()` is where `$_REQUEST` is read.
  def sourceMethods(fileName: String): Set[String] =
    sourceMethodsMemo.getOrElseUpdate(
      fileName,
      methodsIn(fileName).filter(m => m.ast.isCall.exists(c => sourcePatterns.exists(p => c.code.contains(p)))).map(_.name).toSet
    )

  def fedFields(fileName: String): Map[String, String] =
    fedFieldsMemo.getOrElseUpdate(
      fileName, {
        val readers = sourceMethods(fileName)
        methodsIn(fileName).flatMap { m =>
          val params = m.parameter.name.l.filterNot(_ == "this").toSet
          m.ast.isCall.nameExact(ASSIGNMENT).l.flatMap { assignment =>
            val args = assignment.argument.l
            if (args.size < 2) None
            else
              args.head match {
                case target: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call if target.name == FIELD_ACCESS =>
                  val rhs = args(1)
                  val fromParameter = rhs match {
                    case id: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Identifier => params.contains(id.name)
                    case _                                                             => false
                  }
                  val fromSource = sourcePatterns.exists(p => rhs.code.contains(p)) || (readers.nonEmpty && rhs.ast.isCall.name.l.exists(readers.contains))
                  if (fromSource) Some(target.code.trim -> "source")
                  else if (fromParameter) Some(target.code.trim -> "parameter")
                  else None
                case _ => None
              }
          }
        }.groupBy(_._1).map { case (field, kinds) => field -> strongest(kinds.map(_._2)) }
      }
    )

  def fieldCarriedKind: String =
    strongest(cpg.call.nameExact(FIELD_ACCESS).filter(c => inScope(c.method)).l.map(r => prefixKind(r.code.trim, fedFields(r.method.filename))))

  def callbackFedKind(callback: String): String =
    callbackFedMemo.getOrElseUpdate(
      callback,
      strongest(cpg.method.nameExact(callback).l.map { m =>
        if (m.ast.isCall.exists(c => sourcePatterns.exists(p => c.code.contains(p)))) "source"
        else {
          val fed = fedFields(m.filename)
          if (fed.isEmpty) "" else strongest(m.ast.isCall.nameExact(FIELD_ACCESS).code.l.map(code => prefixKind(code.trim, fed)))
        }
      })
    )

  def hookCarriedKind: String =
    if (hookTable.isEmpty || hookApply.isEmpty) ""
    else
      strongest(cpg.call.filter(c => hookApply.contains(c.name)).filter(c => inScope(c.method)).l.flatMap { call =>
        val hook = call.argument.l.headOption.map(a => unquote(a.code)).getOrElse("")
        hookTable.getOrElse(hook, Nil).map(callbackFedKind)
      })

  // ---- EVIDENCE MODE: the same question without the dataflow (flow-aware-ranking, phase 0) --------------
  //
  // Tiering is the CPG query WITHOUT dataflow; arbitration is the query WITH it. Same graph, same facts, two
  // costs. This branch answers "what is in scope" -- which sink calls, what shape they take, whether a
  // cleansing call wraps THEIR argument, whether a source is local or reachable -- and returns before
  // `reachableByFlows` is ever called. Milliseconds per call, where a flow costs 6.63 seconds.
  //
  // Every field is stated in fact-table terms, so the vector means the same thing in every language the
  // graph can hold. A `summary` row is always emitted, even when there are no sinks, because "no sinks" is
  // tier 0 and must be distinguishable from "the query failed".
  if (evidenceS == "true") {
    // Whether a method holds a modelled source, memoised by full name across the batch: the same helper
    // is reachable from hundreds of regions, and re-walking its AST for each of them is what made a
    // no-dataflow query take minutes. `cpg.method.filter(...)` over every method per request was the
    // other half of that, replaced by a direct lookup of the reachable names.
    def methodHasSource(m: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Method): Boolean =
      methodSourceMemo.getOrElseUpdate(m.fullName, m.ast.isCall.exists(c => sourcePatterns.exists(p => c.code.contains(p))))
    val sinkList    = sinkCalls.l
    val sourceLocal = labeledMethods.exists(methodHasSource)
    val sourceNear  = depth > 0 && cpg.method.fullNameExact(reachableMethods.toSeq: _*).exists(methodHasSource)
    // Anywhere in the repository at all. Exact at every callDepth, and the cheapest cut there is: a family
    // with no sink anywhere cannot produce a flow for any region. Memoised on the sink list, because it is
    // the same answer for every request of one family and a repository-wide walk per request turned a
    // milliseconds-per-pair query into minutes.
    val familyInRepo = familyInRepoMemo.getOrElseUpdate(sinksS, cpg.call.exists(c => sinkNames.exists(n => sinkMatches(c, n))))
    // `carried`: stage one of the two-stage join as STRUCTURE, not flow -- see `fedFields` above for why the
    // flow form was a wall. It puts `_delete_files()` (fed by `$this->attachments`) and `record()` (fed by
    // a filter) where their sources say, instead of one tier below every region with a `$_GET` in its own
    // body. Asked only where there is a sink to carry to, so a plugin's 21,000 tier-0 pairs pay nothing.
    // Weak becomes strong only when the FLOW says so. A parameter-fed field is what every constructor
    // makes and what MW WP Form's `_delete_files()` is actually fed by; structure cannot tell the two
    // apart, the join can. So the exact form is asked here for exactly the parameter-fed fields a
    // sink-bearing region reads -- memoised per (family, file, field) for the batch -- and nowhere else.
    // That bounds the flow queries to the cases the structure could not settle, instead of the 1,040
    // sink-bearing pairs that did not finish in 1,800 s.
    val structuralKind = if (sinkList.nonEmpty && familyInRepo) strongest(List(fieldCarriedKind, hookCarriedKind)) else ""
    val carriedKind =
      if (structuralKind != "parameter") structuralKind
      else {
        val confirmed = cpg.call
          .nameExact(FIELD_ACCESS)
          .filter(c => inScope(c.method))
          .l
          .exists(r => prefixKind(r.code.trim, fedFields(r.method.filename)) == "parameter" && taintedPrefixes(r.code.trim, r.method.filename))
        if (confirmed) "source" else "parameter"
      }
    val carried = carriedKind.nonEmpty
    val summary = ujson.Obj(
      "kind"         -> "summary",
      "sinks"        -> sinkList.size,
      "sourceLocal"  -> sourceLocal,
      "sourceNear"   -> sourceNear,
      "carried"      -> carried,
      "carriedKind"  -> carriedKind,
      "carriedBy"    -> (if (structuralKind.isEmpty) "" else if (fieldCarriedKind == structuralKind) "field" else "hook"),
      "familyInRepo" -> familyInRepo
    )
    val perSink = sinkList.map { sink =>
      val realArgs = sink.argument.argumentIndexGt(0).l
      ujson.Obj(
        "kind"            -> "sink",
        "sink"            -> sink.code.take(200),
        "sinkLine"        -> sink.lineNumber.getOrElse(-1).toString,
        "sinkMethod"      -> sink.method.name,
        "sinkFile"        -> sink.method.filename.split("/").last,
        "sinkArity"       -> realArgs.size,
        "sinkArg0Literal" -> realArgs.headOption.map(a => a.isLiteral).getOrElse(false),
        // A sanitizer of this family is an ANCESTOR of an argument in the AST -- it wraps what flows in --
        // as opposed to merely appearing somewhere in the same function. This is the field a text scan
        // gets wrong, and the one that would have misranked CVE-2023-23488: `esc_sql` is in that function,
        // on a different statement.
        "cleansedOnCall"  -> sink.argument.ast.l.exists(node => sanitizesHere(node))
      )
    }
    // Export locations already used by this query, for change attribution only. No new
    // source/sink/guard inference and no change to the evidence vector or its weights.
    val contextRows = if (contextS != "true") Nil else {
      def location(m: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Method, kind: String): ujson.Obj =
        ujson.Obj("kind" -> "context_method", "path" -> m.filename, "function" -> m.name,
          "startLine" -> m.lineNumber.getOrElse(-1), "endLine" -> m.lineNumberEnd.getOrElse(-1),
          "relationship" -> kind)
      val scoped = cpg.method.filterNot(_.isExternal).filter(m => inScope(m)).l
      val methods = scoped.map(m => location(m, if (labeledMethods.exists(_.id == m.id)) "entry" else "callee"))
      // Field carrying is deliberately same-file in the existing abstraction. Retain
      // its file context conservatively, never claim every method carries the value.
      val fieldFiles = if (fieldCarriedKind.isEmpty) Set.empty[String] else
        cpg.call.nameExact(FIELD_ACCESS).filter(c => inScope(c.method)).l.map(_.method.filename).toSet
      val fields = fieldFiles.toList.flatMap(f => methodsIn(f).filterNot(_.isExternal).map(m => location(m, "field")))
      val callbacks = if (hookApply.isEmpty) Nil else cpg.call.filter(c => hookApply.contains(c.name))
        .filter(c => inScope(c.method)).l.flatMap { call =>
          val hook = call.argument.l.headOption.map(a => unquote(a.code)).getOrElse("")
          hookTable.getOrElse(hook, Nil).flatMap(name => cpg.method.nameExact(name).filterNot(_.isExternal).l)
        }.distinct
      val hooks = callbacks.map(m => location(m, "hook"))
      // Export sanitizer locations as guard context, not proof of discharge. Removed
      // guards are retained through base spans and unchanged-line correspondence.
      val guards = scoped.filter(_.ast.l.exists(sanitizesHere)).map(m => location(m, "guard"))
      // Reachability remains bounded. External/dynamic calls and calls outside the
      // current reachability set cannot establish a complete negative for a change.
      // A modeled argument does not summarize its consumer: unknown(req.body),
      // unknown(eval(...)) and unknown("escape") all retain an external boundary.
      // Only the directly invoked fact-named operation can use this exemption.
      def directlyModeled(c: io.shiftleft.codepropertygraph.generated.nodes.Call): Boolean =
        (sinkNames ++ sanitizerNames ++ sourcePatterns).exists { raw =>
          val name = raw.stripSuffix("(")
          c.name == name || c.code.startsWith(name + "(")
        }
      val missing = scoped.exists(m => m.ast.isCall.l.exists { c =>
        !c.name.startsWith("<operator>") && !directlyModeled(c) && {
          val destinations = c.callee.l
          destinations.isEmpty || destinations.exists(d => d.isExternal || !inScope(d))
        }
      })
      // An empty scope has two different causes and they are not interchangeable. A file the
      // frontend produced no methods for is one thing; a question naming a function this file does
      // not define is another, and it is the common one: a route-registration module names handlers
      // that live in other files, so the graph rightly holds no such method here. Reporting both as
      // "scope empty" hides which is which, and only the second names something a reader can act on.
      val boundaries =
        if (function.nonEmpty && scoped.isEmpty)
          List(ujson.Obj("kind" -> "context_boundary", "reason" -> "context_function_unresolved:contributor-scan", "function" -> function))
        else if (scoped.isEmpty)
          List(ujson.Obj("kind" -> "context_boundary", "reason" -> "context_scope_empty:contributor-scan"))
        else if (missing)
          List(ujson.Obj("kind" -> "context_boundary", "reason" -> "dynamic_external_or_depth_context_unresolved:contributor-scan"))
        else Nil
      ujson.Obj("kind" -> "context_summary") :: (methods ++ fields ++ hooks ++ guards ++ boundaries)
    }
    return summary :: (perSink ++ contextRows)
  }

  val rows = sinkCalls.l.flatMap { sink =>
    // Data flows into the arguments; asking the call node itself finds nothing.
    // `call.argument` includes the RECEIVER at argumentIndex 0 (`db` in `db.execute(...)`), so counting it
    // makes a one-argument interpolated call look like a two-argument bound one -- the exact inversion of the
    // test. Real arguments start at index 1.
    val realArgs = sink.argument.argumentIndexGt(0).l
    val flows    = if (hasSources) sink.argument.reachableByFlows(sourceNodes).l else Nil

    // The SHAPE of the sink call, which is what distinguishes a fix from a bug when the fix is a safe form
    // rather than a sanitizing call: `execute(sql, params)` binds where `execute(sql + x)` interpolates, and
    // `printf("literal", x)` is safe where `printf(userFmt)` is not. The taint path is identical in both, so
    // without these two fields the model entails a pair's fixed side exactly as readily as its vulnerable one.
    val arity       = realArgs.size
    val arg0Literal = realArgs.headOption.map(a => a.isLiteral).getOrElse(false)

    // Is there a bound on the data reaching this sink? Only asked of sinks whose CWE says the danger is a
    // length, and the bound must mention a name the sink actually uses -- an unrelated `i < 10` loop in the
    // same function discharges nothing.
    //
    // Scoped to the METHOD rather than to the sink's dominators, and that is deliberate. libpng guards
    // `strcpy(outname+len, ".png")` with `(len = strlen(inname)) > 250`, but the check sits on an else-if
    // chain whose sibling branch skips it entirely, and the protection is carried to the sink through an
    // `error` flag: `++error` in the guarded branch, `if (!error)` around the copy. So the bound does NOT
    // dominate the sink -- Joern is right about that -- and requiring dominance found nothing.
    //
    // Which is exactly why this lowers the rung instead of clearing the finding. A bound on this variable
    // somewhere in this function means the graph CANNOT ENTAIL: it has not shown the copy is unguarded. It
    // has not shown it is guarded either, so the judge is asked. Proving the flag-mediated case needs
    // path-sensitive reasoning this arbiter does not do.
    val boundedSink = boundedNames.exists(n => sink.name == n)
    val argNames    = sink.argument.ast.isIdentifier.name.l.distinct
    val bounds =
      if (!boundedSink || argNames.isEmpty) List.empty
      else
        sink.method.ast.isCall.code.l.filter(c =>
          boundShape.matcher(c).find() && argNames.exists(a => mentionsToken(c, List(a)))
        )

    // ONE ROW PER EVIDENCE KEY, not per path. Every field the driver reads is a property of the sink or of
    // (source kind, source, sanitized); only `length` varies per path, and the driver ranks by the shortest.
    // Emitting every path was a 100x payload term: ten real requests at callDepth 3 returned 3,838 rows
    // for 38 distinct keys, and a whole-repository scan would ship on the order of 130,000 rows to have
    // the reporter collapse them after they were paid for. `paths` keeps the count. Task 5.13.
    flows
      .map { flow =>
        val elements   = flow.elements.map(_.code).l
        val sanitized  = sanitizerNames.nonEmpty && flow.elements.l.exists(node => sanitizesHere(node))
        val sourceKind = sourceKindOf(flow.elements.l.headOption)
        ((sourceKind, elements.headOption.getOrElse("").take(200), sanitized), elements.size)
      }
      .groupBy(_._1)
      .toList
      .sortBy(_._1)
      .map { case ((sourceKind, source, sanitized), paths) =>
        ujson.Obj(
          "sink"            -> sink.code.take(200),
          "sourceKind"      -> sourceKind,
          "sinkLine"        -> sink.lineNumber.getOrElse(-1).toString,
          "sinkMethod"      -> sink.method.name,
          // Where the sink actually is. With callDepth > 0 that need not be the region's own file, and a
          // finding reported against the handler's file when the bug is in another module is unactionable.
          "sinkFile"        -> sink.method.filename,
          "source"          -> source,
          "sanitized"       -> sanitized,
          "length"          -> paths.map(_._2).min,
          "paths"           -> paths.size,
          "sinkArity"       -> arity,
          "sinkArg0Literal" -> arg0Literal,
          "bounded"         -> bounds.nonEmpty,
          "bound"            -> bounds.headOption.getOrElse("").take(120),
          "inLabeledScope"  -> (function.isEmpty || nestedInLabeled(sink.method) || reachableMethods.contains(sink.method.fullName))
        )
      }
  }

    // What this question ENUMERATED in scope, independent of what it traced. A flow row proves a
    // path exists; the absence of one cannot distinguish an operation that is not present from an
    // operation no traced path reached. Change comparison needs that distinction to establish that
    // a change introduced an operation, and reachability is deliberately bounded, so the two can
    // never be separated from flow rows alone. The completion marker is what makes an EMPTY
    // inventory meaningful: without it, a scope that was never enumerated and a scope with no such
    // operation look identical. No new sink inference, alias resolution or fact is introduced here.
    val inventory = sinkCalls.l.map { sink =>
      ujson.Obj(
        "kind"            -> "operation_inventory",
        "inventory"       -> sink.code.take(200),
        "inventoryFile"   -> sink.method.filename,
        "inventoryLine"   -> sink.lineNumber.getOrElse(-1).toString,
        "inventoryMethod" -> sink.method.name
      )
    }

    // The enumeration's own basis, because a consumer cannot infer it. A file- or nesting-scoped
    // question walks calls structurally, so an unresolved call destination cannot remove one from
    // the scope and the inventory is complete regardless of reachability. Following the call graph
    // makes the reachable set the scope, so the same unresolved destination can shrink what was
    // enumerated. Only the first kind can support absence under bounded reachability.
    val inventoryScope = if (function.nonEmpty && depth > 0) "reachability" else "structural"
    rows ++ inventory ++ List(
      ujson.Obj("kind" -> "operation_inventory_complete", "operations" -> inventory.size, "scope" -> inventoryScope)
    )
  }

  println("---OUSAST-CPG-BEGIN---")
  if (requestsJson.nonEmpty) {
    val parsed = ujson.read(requestsJson).obj
    val answers = parsed.map { case (id, req) =>
      def field(name: String): String = req.obj.get(name).map(_.str).getOrElse("")
      val paramSrc = req.obj.get("parameterSources").map(_.str).getOrElse("false")
      val fieldSrc = req.obj.get("fieldSources").map(_.str).getOrElse("true")
      val evidence = req.obj.get("evidenceOnly").map(_.str).getOrElse("false")
      id -> ujson.Arr(
        rowsFor(
          field("sources"),
          field("sinks"),
          field("sanitizers"),
          // Repository-wide, so the driver sends them ONCE as a top-level parameter rather than repeating
          // them in every request. The per-request form is still honoured for the tests and the single
          // -region path.
          if (field("hookCallbacks").nonEmpty) field("hookCallbacks") else hookCallbacks,
          if (field("dispatchApply").nonEmpty) field("dispatchApply") else dispatchApply,
          field("function"),
          paramSrc,
          fieldSrc,
          evidence,
          field("file"),
          field("callDepth"),
          field("boundedSinks"),
          field("contextEvidence")
        ): _*
      )
    }
    // A census of the graph, under a key no request id can collide with (ids are numbers). A frontend can
    // fail every file and STILL exit 0 with a valid, empty CPG -- `joern-parse` does not even propagate the
    // per-file warnings -- so "no rows" and "no graph" are indistinguishable to the driver without this.
    // It rides the batch rather than costing its own invocation, because JVM startup is what this whole
    // batching design exists to avoid.
    val census = ujson.Arr(ujson.Obj("methods" -> cpg.method.size.toString, "files" -> cpg.file.size.toString, "file_names" -> ujson.Arr.from(cpg.file.name.l)))
    println(ujson.write(ujson.Obj.from(answers.toSeq :+ ("__census__" -> census))))
  } else {
    println(
      ujson.write(ujson.Arr(rowsFor(sources, sinks, sanitizers, hookCallbacks, dispatchApply, function, parameterSources, fieldSources, evidenceOnly, file, callDepth, boundedSinks): _*))
    )
  }
  println("---OUSAST-CPG-END---")
}