Files
Open_Ultra_SAST/.opencode/skills/kiro-spec-design/rules/design-discovery-full.md
T
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 4.8 6699f1f8f9 chore: add kiro spec-driven tooling and steering docs
Add the Kiro-style agentic SDLC tooling used to drive this project: the
.opencode/skills/kiro-* skill set (discovery, spec init/requirements/design/
tasks, validation, implementation, review, steering), the .kiro/settings
templates, and AGENTS.md describing the workflow. Update the spec docs
(assessment/design/requirements/tasks) to current state.

Scope tests/test_opencode_skills.py to the project's own openultrasast-*
skills so the third-party kiro-* tooling (which uses a different frontmatter
convention) no longer breaks the frontmatter check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
2026-06-21 14:28:19 +02:00

3.7 KiB

Full Discovery Process for Technical Design

Objective

Conduct comprehensive research and analysis to ensure the technical design is based on complete, accurate, and up-to-date information.

Discovery Steps

1. Requirements Analysis

Map Requirements to Technical Needs

  • Extract all functional requirements from EARS format
  • Identify non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
  • Determine technical constraints and dependencies
  • List core technical challenges

2. Existing Implementation Analysis

Understand Current System (if modifying/extending):

  • Analyze codebase structure and architecture patterns
  • Map reusable components, services, utilities
  • Identify domain boundaries and data flows
  • Document integration points and dependencies
  • Determine approach: extend vs refactor vs wrap

3. Technology Research

Investigate Best Practices and Solutions:

  • Use WebSearch to find:

    • Latest architectural patterns for similar problems
    • Industry best practices for the technology stack
    • Recent updates or changes in relevant technologies
    • Common pitfalls and solutions
  • Use WebFetch to analyze:

    • Official documentation for frameworks/libraries
    • API references and usage examples
    • Migration guides and breaking changes
    • Performance benchmarks and comparisons

4. External Dependencies Investigation

For Each External Service/Library:

  • Search for official documentation and GitHub repositories
  • Verify API signatures and authentication methods
  • Check version compatibility with existing stack
  • Investigate rate limits and usage constraints
  • Find community resources and known issues
  • Document security considerations
  • Note any gaps requiring implementation investigation

5. Architecture Pattern & Boundary Analysis

Evaluate Architectural Options:

  • Compare relevant patterns (MVC, Clean, Hexagonal, Event-driven)
  • Assess fit with existing architecture and steering principles
  • Identify domain boundaries and ownership seams required to avoid team conflicts
  • Consider scalability implications and operational concerns
  • Evaluate maintainability and team expertise
  • Document preferred pattern and rejected alternatives in research.md

6. Risk Assessment

Identify Technical Risks:

  • Performance bottlenecks and scaling limits
  • Security vulnerabilities and attack vectors
  • Integration complexity and coupling
  • Technical debt creation vs resolution
  • Knowledge gaps and training needs

Research Guidelines

Always search for:

  • External API documentation and updates
  • Security best practices for authentication/authorization
  • Performance optimization techniques for identified bottlenecks
  • Latest versions and migration paths for dependencies

Search if uncertain about:

  • Architectural patterns for specific use cases
  • Industry standards for data formats/protocols
  • Compliance requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)
  • Scalability approaches for expected load

Search Strategy

  1. Start with official sources (documentation, GitHub)
  2. Check recent blog posts and articles (last 6 months)
  3. Review Stack Overflow for common issues
  4. Investigate similar open-source implementations

Output Requirements

Capture all findings that impact design decisions in research.md using the shared template:

  • Key insights affecting architecture, technology alignment, and contracts
  • Constraints discovered during research
  • Recommended approaches and selected architecture pattern with rationale
  • Rejected alternatives and trade-offs (documented in the Design Decisions section)
  • Updated domain boundaries that inform Components & Interface Contracts
  • Risks and mitigation strategies
  • Gaps requiring further investigation during implementation