Files
Open_Ultra_SAST/.kiro/specs/contributor-scan/tasks.md
T
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5 4e4681f162 docs(contributor-scan): design and tasks -- wire it, then measure on a real repo
Requirements approved, design and tasks generated. 47 criteria, all traced;
13 tasks in 6 groups.

The design is deliberately conservative. The model layer joins as ONE STAGE
INSIDE MAP, beside the obligations checker it most resembles -- which already
takes entry points, produces findings and merges them. Findings are added, never
substituted; the pattern and overlay paths keep working; a machine without Joern
scans exactly as it does today. Nothing here is allowed to make the tool worse
for someone who does not have the engine.

Two decisions carry the most weight. One CPG per scan rather than per region: a
build is 5-30s on an excerpt and is the dominant cost at repository scale, so
per-region builds would make this unusable. And one total budget rather than the
enumerator's per-region cap of eight, which is meaningless across thousands of
regions; the budget is spent highest-rank-first and whatever it does not reach is
counted and reported, never silently truncated.

Task 2.2 is a go/no-go and comes before shipping: the first scan of a pinned
known-vulnerable checkout is a measurement nobody has taken, and if one CPG per
repository proves infeasible the region and budget design changes shape. Better
to learn that before groups 3-6 are built on it.

Group 5 (corpus) is last on purpose. The binding constraint today is
reachability, not corpus size -- 198 of 238 OWASP pairs went unvendored because
volume without readability makes every number worse.

The task preamble carries the predecessor's two hard-won habits: audit sibling
paths in the same commit as any routing or matching change (five bugs shared
that shape, each caught by a measurement rather than a check), and run the whole
CI list rather than the parts one remembers (CI was red for a session because
`ruff check` passing was taken as evidence for `ruff format --check`).

Not approved for implementation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T7XD7x5KonMdmGRkp63EQG
2026-09-09 07:17:20 +02:00

158 lines
9.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Implementation Plan: contributor-scan
## Guidance for the implementing agent
- **The predecessor's lesson, in one line.** Five bugs in `model-grounded-detection` shared one shape: a
taint-specific assumption applied to every family, each caught by a *measurement* rather than a check.
Before you finish any change to a routing rule, a matching rule, or a per-family question, **grep for its
siblings and fix them in the same commit.** The most expensive instance cost a 19-minute run that returned
an identical number, and only the identity revealed the bug.
- **Run the whole CI list before pushing**, not the parts you remember: `ruff format --check .`,
`ruff check .`, `mypy src/openultrasast`, `pytest`, the three gates, `compileall src tests`, and
`pytest -m semantic`. CI was red for most of a session because `ruff check` passing was taken as evidence
that `ruff format --check` would.
- **The gate baseline is the safety net.** `benchmarks/measurements/2026-09-06-gate-baseline.txt`. Run all
three gates before and after every task. The model layer is additive: if a gate moves, you changed
something that was never meant to change.
- **RED first**, one commit per task, selective `git add`.
- **Zero-dependency core.** Copy the capability-probe pattern in `semantic/extra.py` and `cpg/capability.py`.
- **Do not modify `model/pipeline`, `taint`, `dominance`, `config_value`, `specs` or `candidates`.** They are
built and measured. If a change looks necessary, it belongs in its own commit with its own measurement.
## Group 1 — Wire it (gate-protected)
- [ ] 1.1 Regions from entry points
- `model/regions.py`: `ScanRegion(path, function, families, rank, source)` and
`regions_for(entries, targets, *, taxonomy, language_of)`. Rank from what `EntryPointRecord` already
carries (`access_level`, `trust_boundary`) — do not invent a new signal. File-level fallback when a target
has no entry point, with `source="file_fallback"`. Families from region shape and language, via the
existing `taint_specs`/`dominance_specs`/`config_specs`.
- **Sibling audit (Req 8.5):** family routing now exists in three places — `ceiling.py`'s harness,
`pipeline._arbitrate`, and here. Check all three agree before finishing.
- Observable: a region is produced per entry point; a target with no entry point yields a file region marked
as such; no region carries a family whose spec is absent for its language.
- _Requirements: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 8.5_
- [ ] 1.2 The repository driver
- `model/scan.py`: `ScanBudget`, `ModelScanResult`, `scan_repository(...)`. **One CPG per run**, reused
across regions. Regions in rank order; budget decremented per model call and checked before each; the
remainder counted into `regions_unjudged`. Findings ordered by rung, then rank.
- Observable: one `backend.build` call for many regions; a budget of N yields at most N model calls and a
non-zero `regions_unjudged`; ordering puts `model_entailed` above `suspicion`; a failed CPG build yields
an empty result with `cpg_build_failed`, never an exception.
- Redaction (Req 8.3) is inherited from `model/pipeline`, which redacts every prompt; a test asserts the
driver adds no unredacted path of its own.
- _Requirements: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 8.3_
- _Depends: 1.1_
- [ ] 1.3 The MAP stage
- Wire `scan_repository` into `cli.py` inside `Stage.MAP`, mirroring `_check_obligations`: takes
`entry_points` and `targets`, returns findings merged **additively** beside the pattern, overlay and
obligation findings. A `[model]` config block (enabled, budget, max regions), zero-dep, conservative
defaults. Payload into the manifest with `by_rung`, cost and elapsed.
- Observable: a scan on a repo with Joern present reports findings carrying rungs; the same scan with
`OPENULTRASAST_JOERN_PROBE=off` is identical to today's output plus a `cpg_unavailable` degradation;
**the three gates are byte-identical**.
- The `[model]` block is capability-detected like every other optional plane (Req 8.4): core stays
`dependencies = []`, and the engine, endpoint and execution tier each degrade to a recorded reason.
- _Requirements: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 8.4_
- _Depends: 1.2_
## Group 2 — Scale it (the phase that can reshape the rest)
- [ ] 2.1 A pinned known-vulnerable checkout
- `benchmarks/repos/<name>.toml`: url, commit, the known CVE, the file and function it lives in, licence.
Start with one small enough to iterate on. Fetch is explicit and offline-by-default, like the pointer
pairs.
- Observable: the recipe resolves to a checkout; CI never fetches it.
- _Requirements: 4.1_
- _Depends: 1.3_
- [ ] 2.2 The first repository measurement
- Run the full scan against that checkout and commit the artifact: CPG build time, scan wall-clock, peak
memory, findings by rung, cost, `regions_unjudged`, and **whether the known CVE was found and at which
rung**. If the repository cannot be processed in its envelope, record the stage it failed at.
- This is the go/no-go for the shape of the rest: if one CPG per repository is infeasible, the region and
budget design changes and phases 3–6 should not be built on it first.
- Observable: the artifact exists with every field; the reading states go or no-go and why.
- _Requirements: 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5_
- _Depends: 2.1_
## Group 3 — Ship it
- [ ] 3.1 Contributor output
- `model/report.py`: a scan summary — counts per rung, the top findings with witness and `path:line`, and a
plain statement of what `suspicion` means (the model could not confirm it). Findings to the writable
output only.
- Observable: a scan produces a summary readable without opening JSON; every finding shows rung, witness
and location; nothing is written into the analysed tree.
- Keeps the disciplines already built into `model/report.py` (Req 8.1, 8.2): per-slice rows with the
real-world slice deciding, a refused bare aggregate, and the overfitting gap published beside any headline
— absent rather than zero when a slice is missing.
- _Requirements: 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 8.1, 8.2_
- _Depends: 1.3_
- [ ] 3.2 Build and verify the image
- `docker compose build`, then run a real scan through it and through the shell wrapper. The Dockerfile and
compose exist and are syntax-valid; **the image has never been built**, so nothing about it is proven.
- Observable: the image builds; `TARGET=<repo> docker compose run --rm ousast scan /target` produces the
same findings as a native run; the target mount is read-only; the network is off by default.
- _Requirements: 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5_
- _Depends: 3.1_
## Group 4 — Close the deferred decisions
- [ ] 4.1 The memory-family decision
- Either reach `memory` through an adopted execution tier, or record explicitly that C memory-safety is out
of scope. 173 of the 176 real-world CVE pairs sit idle behind a stub; the decision gates Req 9.2.
- Observable: the decision and its reason are recorded where a later reader finds them; if out of scope,
the corpus says so per slice.
- _Requirements: 7.1, 7.3_
- [ ] 4.2 Retire `evidence_level`
- It duplicates `rung` in intent. Retire it, or record why both are kept. Note the legacy value
`static_corroboration` comes from the flat-IR overlay, which Req 4.4 of the predecessor demotes to the
suspicion band — so a straight rename would overstate it.
- Observable: one vocabulary, or a recorded reason for two; SARIF and JSON consumers considered.
- _Requirements: 7.2, 7.3_
## Group 5 — Grow the corpus
- [ ] 5.1 PHP/WordPress slice
- Plugin and core weaknesses. `php2cpg` needs a PHP interpreter, which the image provides. **Validate on a
sample that the model can read the pairs before vendoring** — the OWASP harvest found 238 and vendored 40
for exactly this reason.
- Observable: a sample measurement precedes vendoring; only categories the model can arbitrate are
vendored; the slice reports as its own row; every pair states a licence.
- _Requirements: 9.1, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7_
- _Depends: 3.2_
- [ ] 5.2 More vibe-code pairs
- The slice where the stated audience works, currently 35 pairs. Same read-check discipline.
- _Requirements: 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7_
- [ ] 5.3 Real-world C library CVEs
- libpng and the image libraries, OpenSSH, libpam, kernel modules. **Gated on 4.1**: until the memory
decision closes these would join 173 idle pairs.
- _Requirements: 9.2, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6_
- _Depends: 4.1_
## Group 6 — Regression baselines
- [ ] 6.1 Repository baseline and delta
- A committed baseline per pinned checkout; a delta report on fact-table or query changes showing findings
gained, lost and rung movements. An unexplained loss of a previously-entailed finding is a regression to
investigate, not a number to accept. The baseline records the **engine version**, because a CPG engine
change moves every verdict.
- _Requirements: 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4_
- _Depends: 2.2_
## Task-plan review notes
- Group 1 must land and pass review before group 2: measuring an unwired pipeline is what produced a
session's worth of harness-only numbers.
- **Task 2.2 is a go/no-go.** If one CPG per repository is infeasible, stop and redesign the region/budget
model rather than building groups 3–6 on an assumption.
- Group 5 is deliberately last. The corpus is not the binding constraint today — reachability is — and 198 of
238 OWASP pairs were left unvendored precisely because volume without readability makes every number worse.