Files
Open_Ultra_SAST/benchmarks/measurements/2026-09-30-harnessx-removal-baseline/scan/fusion.json
T
Marius CiepluchandClaude Opus 5.5 ca5caf735f bench(harnessx-removal): deterministic baseline without the extra (task 1)
Equality script (design section 3) records suite outcomes, `ousast pairs --json`,
the python-vulnerable quick benchmark, one standard scan and `improve --dry-run`
from a frozen export with the harnessx extra absent and no model reachable.
Two independent records are byte-identical (determinism.json).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EmM1j46qgKMh3zqD1QMwEo
2026-09-30 10:42:57 +02:00

193 lines
5.6 KiB
JSON

[
{
"decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
"degradations": [],
"disposition": "accepted",
"finding_id": "python-os-command:app.py:17",
"model_ids": [],
"panels": [
{
"confidence": 0.75,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
"leaning": "vulnerability",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=critical, verified=True",
"role": "panel_a",
"vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
},
{
"confidence": 0.6,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
"leaning": "false_positive",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
"role": "panel_b",
"vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
}
],
"triggered": true,
"triggers": [
"gates_risky_fix",
"severity:critical"
],
"votes": {
"accepted": 2
},
"warnings": []
},
{
"decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
"degradations": [],
"disposition": "accepted",
"finding_id": "python-shell-true:app.py:23",
"model_ids": [],
"panels": [
{
"confidence": 0.75,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
"leaning": "vulnerability",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=critical, verified=True",
"role": "panel_a",
"vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
},
{
"confidence": 0.6,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
"leaning": "false_positive",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
"role": "panel_b",
"vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
}
],
"triggered": true,
"triggers": [
"gates_risky_fix",
"severity:critical"
],
"votes": {
"accepted": 2
},
"warnings": []
},
{
"decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
"degradations": [],
"disposition": "accepted",
"finding_id": "python-sql-injection:app.py:44",
"model_ids": [],
"panels": [
{
"confidence": 0.75,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
"leaning": "vulnerability",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=high, verified=True",
"role": "panel_a",
"vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
},
{
"confidence": 0.6,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
"leaning": "false_positive",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
"role": "panel_b",
"vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
}
],
"triggered": true,
"triggers": [
"gates_risky_fix",
"severity:high"
],
"votes": {
"accepted": 2
},
"warnings": []
},
{
"decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
"degradations": [],
"disposition": "accepted",
"finding_id": "python-sql-injection:app.py:50",
"model_ids": [],
"panels": [
{
"confidence": 0.75,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
"leaning": "vulnerability",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=high, verified=True",
"role": "panel_a",
"vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
},
{
"confidence": 0.6,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
"leaning": "false_positive",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
"role": "panel_b",
"vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
}
],
"triggered": true,
"triggers": [
"gates_risky_fix",
"severity:high"
],
"votes": {
"accepted": 2
},
"warnings": []
},
{
"decision_source": "deterministic-reconciler",
"degradations": [],
"disposition": "accepted",
"finding_id": "python-unsafe-eval:app.py:28",
"model_ids": [],
"panels": [
{
"confidence": 0.75,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Reachability or sanitizer evidence could still neutralize the sink.",
"leaning": "vulnerability",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachability=reachable, severity=critical, verified=True",
"role": "panel_a",
"vulnerability_case": "Static corroboration exists and function-level reachability evidence is attached."
},
{
"confidence": 0.6,
"disposition": "accepted",
"false_positive_case": "Impact and exploitability still require deeper verifier or dynamic evidence.",
"leaning": "false_positive",
"model_id": null,
"rationale": "reachable=True, rejected=False, verified=True",
"role": "panel_b",
"vulnerability_case": "A tainted sink shape exists in the source."
}
],
"triggered": true,
"triggers": [
"gates_risky_fix",
"severity:critical"
],
"votes": {
"accepted": 2
},
"warnings": []
}
]